Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A girl with...history

Lumps

By Lumps,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

Ok so I met this girl, I've been with a lot of girls and I always thought the girl

I'd settle down with was less experienced. This girl has been with a lot of guys though but the problem is our compatibility, we're crazy for one another, totally get along and feel so comfortable around one another it's creepy. Spending the day looking at one another wondering what could be is fun, but the negative is the downfall will be so much harder.

At the same time I have another girl I'm seeing, doesn't have the body of the first girl or the attractiveness going on but in the intellectual department she is unmatched we connect intellectual so well just spending the day talking is so much fun.

Then there's that third girl who intellectually isn't there and attraction isn't quite there either but sexually it's like one person exists. Our sex is the best ever, it will never get better. When you're away all you do is crave the sex but you know there is not intellectual or physical attraction and the relationship is doomed for failure regardless of sex.

Which do you chose and why? Attraction as a feeling of potential, intellectual compatibility that will never end, or as straight up sex and physical compatibility?

Keep in mind you chose one and you lose the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Which one has the most money? I'd pick that girl.

Now this is something that definitely doesn't matter to me but the sex girl has the best future, attractive and experienced girl is next but he intellectual is educated...and she is Asian, might make a difference to you haha.

Keep around the first one until you meet someone else or say fug it and settle because you're not getting any younger.

The first one, huh? Interesting take because the first one is the newest of the bunch...sex is still in the primitive stages and the future is exciting yet unknown and attractiveness is there but man she has just been with so many guys hard to trust anything at this point. Do you guys care about a girls' experience? I usually don't even touch a girl who goes beyond my 'reasonable' number. I mean are standards even allowed now days?

Why must you settle on one of those three? Keep searching for she who is attractive, is good in bed, and with whom you connect intellectually.

Otherwise, the deficiencies will drive you bananas.

I'm already going crazy trying to figure this out. Believe me, part of me is just wanting to say fug it and leave them all. But at the same time does such thing exist? Attractive and exited about a future, intellectual compatibility and great sex? It seems too good to be true. I've been with a lot of girls and my routine is becoming very old...I've never come across all three, seems impossible.

How are you having great sex without being physically attracted to the girl? I mean, I've bedded some ugly girls but usually not more than one drunken time and I find a high level of mutual attraction to be essential to great sex.

I know, right? Believe it or not sex isn't just about physical attraction....it's about mental being there....knowing exactly what to do with your partner and always doing it at the exact right moment. It's like the difference between a hot ass girl giving you crappy head vs. an average girl you feel you've known since childhood giving you one head like the world ends tomorrow. It's sexual compatibility not to be confused with physical attractiveness.

I can't even have sex with one girl.

On a serious note , go for the girl that will make you happy. Look for someone for the future.

And there is the problem, I just don't know...can't date all three, been down that path before and poo gets crazy...at some point I'll have to chose.

0cffce2068c5597f1566ac2174ddb419d7565f3c

Are you mad because I'm banging three chicks and have a dilemma? I'd bet irony says I wish I were you and you wish were me :/.

Looks fade. Sex always fades. If you genuinely get along with someone and connect then that will last a lot longer than the other two IMO.

Good, sound advice. It's hard when you're in the 'now' though, giving up either great sex or someone you're attracted to and have potential for someone who gives you only mind orgasms. But I am leaning towards what you're staying. I feel as though great sex will end if I chose this route though, and while that may fade in time...not yet!

Make a Stepford blended of the three.

Haha, I wish.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

Can't quote you because you quoted so many people but I think you listed the first girl first because you like her best, just my hunch.  That's what I'd do if I was ranking women I was seeing, list the one I liked best first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jfra78
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By jfra78 · Posted

      6 pages of tuka and Seltzer arguing is actually 97 pages long
    • Seltzer
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Seltzer · Posted

      100%. And these same people will claim you have an agenda. You can't have it every way. We had the lowest rated defense in the league last year. Statistically the worst ever. By PFF grades (for whatever that's worth- but they are readily accepted, used, and conveyed by most "reputable" sources), the defense was the worst ever. Not only that, PFF rated our receiving corp the worst in football last season. The absolute worst... out of 32 teams. Which is why regardless of the lip service Canales and Morgan paid to the current guys, they knew it would be criminal not to give Bryce more help. People fixating on team stats and not taking these things into context are stupid, plain and simple, and I'm for one thankful they're not running this team (or probably anything for that matter bc they obviously can't discern reality. Again, going back to the eyeball test these Narrative Nancies seem to hate so much, did they not see the windows Bryce was putting balls into? Have the generally not watched much NFL? Please, please show me the film where all these NFL QBs are making throws like this to this point Bryce was "below average" down the stretch compared to them. Bryce made more wow throws in that 3 game stretch of the Bucs, Chiefs, and Eagles than every other QB combined in all the years since since Cam got hurt I genuinely am baffled by people that can watch throws like that and act like it's nothing. I guarantee you Steve Spagnola, Todd Bowles, and and Vic Fangio didn't think it was nothing after watching the little guy torch them with players those teams would be embarrassed to trot out at the skill position players. The national media spent all year making excuses for Mahomes not having elite weapons when he had multiple 1st & 2nd round talents at the skill positions along with future HoFers in Kelce and Hopkins. Bryce wasn't throwing for 300 yards every week with David Moore and Adam Theilen in spite of jaw dropping throws and you want to say the guy played below average. For those people, again, we ain't watching the same sport. And the name calling doesn't change that... The vitriol and projection... it's off the effing charts with these people.  
    • frankw
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By frankw · Posted

      "Well you see if you remove this terrible game that terrible game this other terrible game and then focus on these games you'll see he's actually one of the better QB's in the league and he's actually as good as Jayden Daniels". My god this place is delusional. I love it.
×
×
  • Create New...