Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Goodson vs. Jonathan Stewart


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Could we be seeing a changing of the guard and not even know it? Goodson looks really impressive. He is probably the most pleasant surprise that we have this pre-season. I just want to know if he can really take it to the house on any given play with the explosiveness that Stewart can. If Stewart didn't have the durability questions surrounding him, would he be the decided superior back? Is Goodson even that good. He sure looked good vs. the might Raven defense.

Is Goodson worth more carries at Stewart's expense, or is he just the flavor of the pre-season (destined to fall off the radar with the impending return of the talented, but seemingly injury prone, Stewart?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one expected this much, this quickly from a fourth round pick, but frankly he is our 3rd best running back, and its not even close. Jonathan Stewart has speed(though not as much as Goodson obviously), but more importantly, a tremendous amount of power when he runs behind his pads. Goodson will most likely just be subbed in the game to run screens(and it will be horribly predictable, and will probably be shut down in the regular season).

Note: The Giants 3 headed rushing attack was more like a EARTH, WIND, and a little bit of smoke. Bradshaw barely saw the field last year, and it was only when Ward was ineffective. I don't really expect us to balance the 3 runningbacks well at all, will probably be a two headed monster with the third popping up for 1-2 plays a game to try to generate a spark(aka a screen to Goodson) for the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

offensively he is what is going to put us over the top. he won't be used often, imo, but when he is big things will happen.

of course he could be used pretty heavily throughout the game...just rotate out the three.

defenses are going to get pretty worn out dealing with these three.

fox will go with the hot hand and all three will be given shots. williams first, stewart second, and goodson third. whoever gets the best results will see the most carries.

i don't see this as pushing one guy out. it's more that the team that ran it super effectively down everyone's throats last year is going to run it even more.

last year the ravens ran the ball 592 times i think. i would like to see us hit 600 next year. with these three we could do some real damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I saw that they did with Goodson is lining him up to the outside at receiver. I could see something like Reggie Bush with the Saint's. Kind of a utility player, who can possibly bring a spark from Running Back to Wide Receiver to Kick/Punt Returner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Actually that 4400 was based on a 16 game season to match Bryce's 16 games this year. Your offense has to be to drive the ball when it matters. Bryce doesn't do that with any level of consistency. If you're building a team that isn't focused on your QB, then fine. Then there's no need to pay Bryce as a franchise QB because literally anyone else will do. If you're going to pay him 50m plus per season, you have to be able to put the team on his shoulders and know he's going to carry the load. So far, when the pressure is on to get it done, Bryce has fallen miserably short of the target. 4-6 to finish out the season and 0-2 when all we need is a win to secure a playoff spot isn't stepping up and proving yourself as a franchise QB. I'd say it's quite the opposite.  There isn't a single coach in this league that would take Bryce over Burrow and very few if any that would take Bryce over Prescott. Hurts didn't have to throw in 2025 because Philly's defense was disgusting and Saquan had a MVP season. But then again, Hurts has shown that he can when it counts, and then there's his signature. Philly runs the tush push to lethal perfection, but that's a play we can't even consider with Bryce. You used 3 QBs from teams that had no defense to show QB stats don't always matter. When we had the worst defense in the NFL, we didn't see Bryce step up and carry the offense and put up gaudy numbers in a losing season because we were playing catch up. It was pretty much the opposite.  What have we seen from Bryce consistently to consider offering him a top 10 NFL franchise QB level contract? At the end of the day, that's all that matters.   
    • I mean, what fanbase has high expectations when you have a QB like Bryce leading your team?
    • If you pay Bryce $50M a year you greatly limit your ability to put the type of team around him you need to have to have a chance to win. THAT is the problem. Hell, we can't win with him on a rookie contract. How the hell are we supposed to start winning with him paying him like a franchise QB and having to make tough roster decisions to accommodate his cap hit? 
×
×
  • Create New...