Panthers talk to Greg Jennings

[iamhubby1]

glad to see you missed the point entirely.

The thing is, if you cannot get your point across without seeming to be oh so superior. Maybe you need to rethink your approach.

Those that can, teach. Those that cannot, troll.

Ah hellz, nevermind.

[pantherclaw]

Yeah, being blunt can be taken that way.

[pantherclaw]

Yeah Dave really acts like he wanted him when he called him a "economic signing"...

Do you know what that means Siegfried? ?

Let me explain in common terms. .

He was cheap ..

Example:

If I could afford steak... I wouldn't eat Ramen noodles. .

I'll say this about ya, you are consistent at thinking you are smarter than you really are.

[TN05]

glad to see you missed the point entirely.

If your point was Jericho Cotchery is anywhere near as effective as Ricky Proehl, your point is absurd.

[WOW!!]

I'll say this about ya, you are consistent at thinking you are smarter than you really are.

"Economic signing" means a talent player we truly wanted to you I guess..

You know he could have said Cotchery was the player we wanted and money wasn't a reason right???

[mbarbour21]

If we sign Jennings, we're not taking a wideout the 1st. Get that through your head.

Not necessarily true. Signing Jennings would free us up to take BPA, therefore not reaching for a WR or whatever. That doesn't mean WR won't be BPA tho.

[t96]

Not necessarily true. Signing Jennings would free us up to take BPA, therefore not reaching for a WR or whatever. That doesn't mean WR won't be BPA tho.

 

BPA isn't a set thing, it changes based on the landscape of the team. Maybe we'd take one of the top 4 but we would not take any others at 25. Have a feeling there will be a run on wideout and Strong won't fall, therefore no wideout in the first.

[Mr. Scot]

BPA isn't a set thing, it changes based on the landscape of the team. Maybe we'd take one of the top 4 but we would not take any others at 25. Have a feeling there will be a run on wideout and Strong won't fall, therefore no wideout in the first.

Correct, with one small caveat.

If free agency goes as planned - i.e. no immediate holes left when it's done - then technically the landscape could look pretty similar from year to year.

[GoobyPls]

Disagree about rather having Crabtree. Would rather have Jennings.

 

Oh please, If Crabtree signs tomorrow you would throw Jennings under the bus in a heartbeat.

 

Jennings is 32 and has peaked already, he's a product of two HOF QB's

 

 

Crabtree is still relatively young and Cam would be the best QB he has played with to date. He's also great at YAC something the panthers desperately need.

[CarolinaSock]

Oh please, If Crabtree signs tomorrow you would throw Jennings under the bus in a heartbeat.

 

Jennings is 32 and has peaked already, he's a product of two HOF QB's

 

 

Crabtree is still relatively young and Cam would be the best QB he has played with to date. He's also great at YAC something the panthers desperately need.

 

Cotchery averaged more YAC/catch than Crabtree and Jennings last year.

[Mr. Scot]

Cotchery averaged more YAC/catch than Crabtree and Jennings last year.

Aaahhh, he's just a product of the sys...wait

[CarolinaSock]

Aaahhh, he's just a product of the sys...wait

 

Even worse 3 other Minnesota receivers were in the top 35 in YAC/catch, so Jennings was actually the outlier in that offense. 34 year old Boldin averaged a yard more a catch in YAC than Crabtree last year.

[Mr. Scot]

Even worse 3 other Minnesota receivers were in the top 35 in YAC/catch, so Jennings was actually the outlier in that offense. 34 year old Boldin averaged a yard more a catch in YAC than Crabtree last year.

I'm not a big Crabtree fan.

[rodeo]

YAC is really not the main thing you look for in a WR. It's nice to have, but getting open and catching are more important.