Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

About those combine 40 times that follow a player around his career....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Small sample size though...some people keep it some people don't.

 

I bet Reggie Bush, Vick, and Chris Johnson wouldn't run 4.79's. Now that doesn't make any of those any good just means they are fast. Also I agree the game isn't played in shorts and they train for that as well.

 

I'd like to see them run from the WR stance and clock it that way...and for RBs could use the RB coming from the back field and time them from there. Or something similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This reminds me of a common pitfall here.

A load of the threads we get with people screaming "sign this guy" happen because folks remember the player they used to be.

Some guys are only legitimately good enough to play in the NFL for a year or two. The wear on their bodies just takes too much toll.

You should never assume that just because some guys are capable of lasting ten years or more in the NFL that everyone who makes it to the League can last that long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Wow!  You've done your homework.  Very good, my old guitar picking friend.
    • Consider it from the lens that the NFL is an entertainment product, whose goal is to keep users engaged for a long as possible. Also take into account sports betting spreads for a reason managing games towards desired outcomes. Blowout results are not good for user engagement or for any of the NFL's partners. The league appears to "nudge" games, not necessarily to decide a winner, but to maximize engagement, revenue, and narrative intrigue. The primary lever the NFL uses to "nudge" games towards a desired outcome is crew assignment. A "rigged" game doesn't require a backroom bribe, it simply requires assigning a referee crew whose known statistical biases align with the league's desired outcome. By analyzing data from the 2023-2025 seasons, we can categorize specific officials into "profiles" that sophisticated bettors, and likely the league itself, use to predict game flow. When the league needs a game to be an exciting shootout, they can assign crews that historically "swallow the whistle," allowing offenses to operate without rhythm-killing flags. Conversely, if the league needs to slow down a runaway offense or keep a game close to the spread, they can assign "flag-happy" crews that disrupt game flow. Certain referees show a statistical deviation that heavily favors the home team, often attributed to being influenced by crowd noise, or perhaps a tendency to support the "house" advantage. Lastly, the league might want to introduce chaos into a matchup that looks like a guaranteed blowout on paper. The league would assign a referee with high-variance penalties. A high volume of highly varied penalties is ideal for "trap games" where referees have an outsized impact on the result.
×
×
  • Create New...