Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why are Superman and Batman fighting?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I think the gist of it is that Batman is wary of this alien and if he's really what he says he is.

 

I mean they destroyed Metropolis in that last movie and this is a sequel to that...

 

The comic guys will have a better answer I'm sure.

 

 

OK, question for you then. .... how are the boobs in the movie shaping up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, question for you then. .... how are the boobs in the movie shaping up?

 

Based on that trailer, I'd say rather poorly...

 

Based on the cast... I'd say they don't have too terribly much to work with in the boob dept although I do find Amy Adams to be very attractive...

 

 

Gal Gadot (as Wonder Woman)

 

gal-gadot-uk-premiere-fast-and-furious-6

 

 

 

Amy Adams (as Lois Lane)

 

936full-amy-adams.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spoilers!!!

 

In

Batman v Superman Superman is no lackey of the government; if anything many of the world's governments distrust the guy. But it is Superman who goes to Gotham and starts the confrontation... at the behest of Lex Luthor. And unlike The Dark Knight Returns, Superman comes out swinging, pulverizing the Batmobile with one punch. Why would Superman do Lex Luthor's bidding? What is Lex hoping to accomplish? That would be spoiling. But know that when the fight is over, Batman will be able to point to Superman and say, "He started it!"

http://badassdigest.com/2015/03/25/why-are-batman-and-superman-fighting-in-batman-v-superman/ 

 

 

Also this Batman is unlike any we've seen on screen before. From what I've read, he's very much in the shadows, to the point people don't believe he even exists. He's a myth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Batman is a straight up ninja in this rendition, lurking in the shadows making Gotham a better place by beating people to a pulp. But he realizes that he might be the only man on earth that is able to stand up to this alien that could theoretically destroy the human race. 

 

Imagine you're in a bar and you're 22 years old. Some guy is drunk as hell and is causing a scene. But he's big- no one wants to go up to him and tell him to calm down. 

 

So you being the brave knight you are go up and ask him what's wrong, but he's hammered and admittedly you'e kinda drunk too so things get mixed up. The night ends with you guys hugging and drinking shots together because you both saved a damsel in distress from the real threat- a douche bag womanizer 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no fan of Farci. The guy is a giant douche but he guessed right. Except...

Batman will likely be the lackey in this one. For who? Maybe Lex Luthor indirectly. Rumor has it that Batman will come out of retirement (after Robin's murder) to investigate Kal-El.

 

 

where's that from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spoilers!!!

 

In

Batman v Superman Superman is no lackey of the government; if anything many of the world's governments distrust the guy. But it is Superman who goes to Gotham and starts the confrontation... at the behest of Lex Luthor. And unlike The Dark Knight Returns, Superman comes out swinging, pulverizing the Batmobile with one punch. Why would Superman do Lex Luthor's bidding? What is Lex hoping to accomplish? That would be spoiling. But know that when the fight is over, Batman will be able to point to Superman and say, "He started it!"

http://badassdigest.com/2015/03/25/why-are-batman-and-superman-fighting-in-batman-v-superman/ 

 

 

Also this Batman is unlike any we've seen on screen before. From what I've read, he's very much in the shadows, to the point people don't believe he even exists. He's a myth.

 

This is good

I said somewhere on the huddle a while back that I think Batman vs. Superman would only work if they had Bruce Wayne remain the moral compass. Superman in movies hardly works because they never explore his dark side. Reading your post just increased my interest in this movie a hundred fold.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd add that superheroes initially distrusting each other and duking it out at their first meeting before becoming allies has been a pretty common event in comics for a while now.

 

Kinda makes sense when you think about it.  Big egos, 'outside the law' attitudes, etc.

 

Pretty sure Marvel started it, maybe about the time they turned the X-Men from heroes to outcasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd add that superheroes initially distrusting each other and duking it out at their first meeting before becoming allies has been a pretty common event in comics for a while now.

 

Kinda makes sense when you think about it.  Big egos, 'outside the law' attitudes, etc.

 

Pretty sure Marvel started it, maybe about the time they turned the X-Men from heroes to outcasts.

 

Might be the first time Marvel actually did something original or before DC did a better version of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Batman is a straight up ninja in this rendition, lurking in the shadows making Gotham a better place by beating people to a pulp. But he realizes that he might be the only man on earth that is able to stand up to this alien that could theoretically destroy the human race. 

 

Imagine you're in a bar and you're 22 years old. Some guy is drunk as hell and is causing a scene. But he's big- no one wants to go up to him and tell him to calm down. 

 

So you being the brave knight you are go up and ask him what's wrong, but he's hammered and admittedly you'e kinda drunk too so things get mixed up. The night ends with you guys hugging and drinking shots together because you both saved a damsel in distress from the real threat- a douche bag womanizer 

 

Classic post!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lions were never going Freeling over Miller for the same reason we wouldn't have taken Miller had Freeling not been on the board. Miller is a career RT Lions have a hole at RT, we have a hole at LT. If we took Miller, it would have been for him to backup Moton until he retires and/or we release him, so the best case scenario is it would have been a wasted 1st round pick for at least 1, if not 2 years.  At least Freeling has a shot at playing this year without injury ahead of him, he absolutely can win the LT job if he earns it, but Miller would have never supplanted Moton this year unless he got hurt.
    • What up y’all. I like threads like this where we can stroll down memory lane. I remember the insane amount of site traffic pre-crash when we signed Keyshawn Johnson, 06 I believe. Raging about the Cowboys Christmas Eve loss in 05 (Peppers touched that FG attempt as sure as Cotchery caught it). When I found the huddle I basically had a first born baby, now I’ve got one in college and one in high school. Life comes at you fast, but the Panthers and the Huddle has been a steady constant in my life for many years.  Those who have been here, y’all are cool with me any time any where.    Cheers, genitals!
    • This is a weird post since it wasn’t like we got A’s across the board. We needed a QB and got a consensus top 2 player at that position. (I was pretty vocal that Stroud should’ve been the guy but…)  I think this draft we generally got better value. I’m not particularly optimistic on BY but another year in this offense playing with TMac he really needs to be a consistently average QB at a minimum 
×
×
  • Create New...