Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettleman: 4-5 Left Tackles in draft, good chance we get one, WR class has more depth in later rounds


gettlemanjack

Recommended Posts

Black & Blue Review @ BlackBlueReview

48m

DG talking about how key in 1st round when it comes to OT is

finding a guy who can play LT. Lots of LTs are RTs.

HOW MANY OT CAN PLAY LT IN THIS DRAFT?

Jonathan Jones @ jjones9

39m

Gettleman thinks 4-5 guys in this year's draft could play LT in

NFL

Carolina Panthers @ Panthers

44m

In Gettleman's opinion, there are four or five players capable of

playing left tackle in this year's draft class.

Steve Reed @ SteveReedAP

35m

Gettleman says he thinks there are 4-5 players who can be a left

tackle in this draft.

Black & Blue Review @ BlackBlueReview

42m

DG: 4 or 5 guys in this draft can play LT, in his opinion.

Joe Person @ josephperson

43m

Gettleman: Says he thinks 4-5 players in this draft could play left

tackle

WHAT ARE THE CHANCES ONE OF THEM BEING THERE AT #25?

Joe Person @ josephperson

47m

Gettleman says there is a player who could be long-term solution at left tackle at 25.

Max Henson @ PanthersMax

34m

Gettleman says "there is a chance" Panthers could get a left

tackle at 25.

Steve Reed @ SteveReedAP

39m

Is there a long term guy at LT at No. 25. Yes, there could

Steve Reed @ SteveReedAP

23m

Gettleman said you have to be patient and "hope teams ahead

of you make mistakes."

WHAT ABOUT WR?

Max Henson @ PanthersMax

25m

There isn't as much top-end WR talent this year, but Gettleman

feels 2015 WR class could offer more depth.

Steve Reed @ SteveReedAP

35m

Gettleman on WR group: Feels there is a lot of value. Said last

year's group was "unique." But says more depth in this year's

group.

Joe Person @ josephperson

42m

While saying how special WR group was last year, Gettleman

says there's more depth at the position this year.

Jonathan Jones @ jjones9

38m

Gettleman: More depth at WR in this year's group

Carolina Panthers @ Panthers

42m

Gettleman feels that there is more depth at WR in this year's

draft than last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charlotte Observer:

Jonathan Jones @ jjones9

Apr 23

Mayock says Flowers, Peat, Humphries and Clemmings will be

there at 25 for Panthers

Jonathan Jones @ jjones9

Apr 23

I've said it before I don't think Panthers go after Clemmings.

The other three are definitely in play if available (don't think Peat

will be)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picking this late its just so difficult for us, or the team, to focus too much on any one position or player.  There are innumerable variables that can occur prior to 25 so who we pick will ultimately be the result of what the 24 teams above us do.  DG has filled in the weak spots on the roster with veterans so he can go BPA without hamstringing the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...