Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yes, Shaq was indeed the BPA


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Before the draft I telegraphed to you the top targets in the first round. 

 

Gurley -> Humphries -> Shaq -> Peat .... in that order. This wasn't based on my own opinion, but other sources. 

 

 

True to form, Gettleman chose the BPA and not the position of greatest need. 

 

It was not a reach. Gettleman truly believes Shaq was the most talented football player on the board at 25. 

 

 

He may not have been your BPA, or the media's BPA, but he definitely was Gettleman's. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my only complaint is those cunts in Arizona stole the chance away from us to decide between Humphries and Shaq- that would have been interesting 

 

 

Would have been Humphries

 

 

and yes, would still have been Shaq if Peat was on the board. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shaq was only the best player in the minds of Gettleman and his little minions. 

 

Look, I like the guy---Gettleman and Shaq---but neither were the BPA last night.

 

 

Gettleman's opinion ____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Your opinion _ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My main complaint is: if we had Humphries rated that highly, we should have gone up and got him. Everybody and their mother knew AZ was taking him. Disappointed we didn't move ahead of Det. bc this would have been the year to trade up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman's opinion ____________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Your opinion _ 

 

 

Before I drank some of that snake oil that Gettleman was selling last year, I was of the opinion that Bell and Chandler were shaky at the very best, and I was also of the opinion that our wide receiving corps was extremely uninspiring and lacking. Well, I hate to tell you, I was correct on both accounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We have without question one of the worst QB rooms in the league and your key concern is people having the audacity to be talking about it lol.
    • I saw this list crossing the screen waiting for any Panther.  Chubba, JC Horn and Hunt.  It was a crime to see so many that were not as good as these three.  ESPN is garbage anyhow.
    • Bingo!  We are on the same page.  Our scouting department was average under Hurney, but at least we hit hit it out of the park with our first rounders.  Our scouting department under Tepper's reign with his revolving doors of HCs and GMs has sucked because the scouts largely stay in place.  One or two may change every few years, but the core philosophy stays in place and I believe that to be heavily RAS influenced.    Looking the part of a football player (physical/athletic measurables) vastly outweighs putting on the tape and deep diving into his stats with our scouting department. Until we change that mindset, this team is doomed. Again, how many of us Huddlers (none of us are professional scouts) wanted McConkey over Legette? Yet, we went with XL.  Why?  RAS score, pure and simple.  If you put on the tape and look at the numbers without taking RAS into account, McConkey was the clear choice.
×
×
  • Create New...