Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"When you build the team right, it minimizes the importance of the quarterback." - Mike Pettine


Recommended Posts

100% wrong.  That's why the Browns haven't made the playoffs since 2002.

 

Buffalo's old GM once said "When you have a QB you can just draft Best Player Available"

 

For those who don't know, Buddy Nix, Buffalo's old GM got caught in an illegally record phone scam some kids concocted.  Funny story if you wanna read it.   http://deadspin.com/pranksters-record-two-nfl-gms-discussing-free-agency-ov-452366184

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't it make sense to build a team where you minimize your dependence on any one position? Isn't that pretty much exactly what many on here would say Seattle has done considering the prevailing opinion of Wilson around here?

 

It IS what Seattle has done with Wilson, but you still need a good QB that can run the system.  And Wilson is a good QB that can run their system.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It IS what Seattle has done with Wilson, but you still need a good QB that can run the system. And Wilson is a good QB that can run their system.

I suspect this is what he might have been trying to say but failed. I think you need a pretty good QB but if you've built a good team you can do it in a way that the guys in the correct positions can minimize the flaws a QB may have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, sorry, but he isn't wrong. Of course the QB position is the most important but you're all missing the point. You don't have to have a superstar to win if you build a good overall team. The problem is the browns can't do that either.

 

 

But imagine when you have both its called a Dynasty my friend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...