Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL says Pats guilty, and Brady knew


Recommended Posts

That's not a very strong statement. Probable?

 

Per the report 

 

"Under the Policy, the “standard of proof required to find that a violation of the competitive rules has occurred” is a “Preponderance of the Evidence,” meaning that “as a whole, the fact sought to be proved is more probable than not.”

 

My guess is the term probable was used specifically because that's the language in the CBA (the Policy).  They didn't want to go stronger because they aren't required too, and therefore less exposed for appeals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing properly inflated in New England is Bill Belechick's date. 

 

Sorry, but the receiver reporting as ineligible, spy gate, etc.  The patriots are always trying to find some way to bend the rules in plain view or break them behind the scenes.  How sweet is that Super Bowl trophy now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they hung 45 on the colts because they were better..dumbest story ever

 

Until now. 

 

If you are counting the points they scored while cheating to verify the fact that they did not need to cheat, THAT might be the dumbest story ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...