Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 reasons the Saints will win NFCS


heelinfine

Recommended Posts

We got lucky last season?

 

BR obviously has no idea what luck Is. 

 

What a frigin joke 

 

 

I knew this would  be fun. I like the #1 reason.........because Sean Peyton is angry. Good stuff. I realize it's just a homer fluff piece like someone else pointed out, still fun though. Is it September yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand how this team is so loved after losing arguably a top 5-10 offensive talent in Graham while still not proving they can play any defense.

 

You don't win without defense.

 

Cheating stuff aside, the Patriots improved defensive play is what put them over the top. I don't have to elaborate on Seattle. The Colts have all that offense but their defense is soft and it showed.

 

The Saints and Falcons both have mediocre defenses at best and that's why I'm not too worried about them.

 

Any analyst that looks at this Saints team or the Falcons and projects them as champs are putting their eggs in a risky basket.

 

I'll take a consistent defense any day over flashy offense, especially a flashy offense with less weapons.

Didn't they lose Pierre Thomas too? He was a good player/fit for them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh. We went out there and crushed both the Saints and Falcons last year, when the season was on the line, clearly showing were the cream of the crop in the division. Now, the Saints might've gotten better over the offseason, but we've made moves to better ourselves as well plus our young guys are a year older. 

I really feel we're getting that NFCS crown again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

look at how entitled saints fans are

oh no it's not possible that the panthers could have maybe been a better team in 2014 as evidenced by both of the blowout victories on the road in hostile stadiums against teams in contention for the division late in the year.  it was just blind, dumb luck.

e: also have to praise the writer for his quality analysis of our first round pick which basically boiled down to "mel kiper had breshad perriman ranked higher and the panthers didn't need a linebacker".  great poo i'm sure espn is going to be lighting your phone up any minute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...