Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

EOY Best WR predictions?


X-Clown on 1

Recommended Posts

No, because of the way our offense is structured. We're a run-first offense and Olsen is going to be either the top target or 2nd to KB. I think Funch will be a huge help to our offense, but he's not going to put up 1,000 like KB did last year and make people think our WRs are top 5. But also, those are pretty damn high hopes for a 2nd year player and a rookie 2nd round pick. Remember the days (before 2014's rookie WR class) when rookie WRs needed time to adapt to the game and improve? Because of last year, the expectations for rookie wideouts are stupidly high, and a lot of fans will be disappointed this year. Honestly, only rookie WR I see going over 1,000 yards this year is Agholor. Cooper may based on volume, but he won't be as effective this year in my opinion as Agholor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a shula run offens will never be among the top producing in the league.

 

esp. with a defense like we have that gives you short fields on a regular basis and the improved STs will probably help with that field postion that limits yardage, etc. points will also be low just because it is a slower run offense that eats up the clock and limits opportunities to score.

 

if we run more no huddle this year, that might change. until that happens and/or shula is gone i wouldn't expect more than olsen and one WR to have significant numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a shula run offens will never be among the top producing in the league.

Shula has never had a backfield this good, a line this good, or a receiving corps this good. I expect us to have a top-ten scoring offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula has never had a backfield this good, a line this good, or a receiving corps this good. I expect us to have a top-ten scoring offense.

​it's not personnel that has been the major problem. it's philosophy. he's a ball/clock control guy and he always has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

​it's not personnel that has been the major problem. it's philosophy. he's a ball/clock control guy and he always has been.

​And we have the personnel to make it work. Worked well enough in 2013 with inferior talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

​And we have the personnel to make it work. Worked well enough in 2013 with inferior talent.

​making it work doesn't mean higher scoring.

the way he runs an offense takes tons of time off the clock on each possession. more time taken during possessions limits the number of possessions you can have during a game. limited possessions means limited scoring opportunities. limited scoring opportunities means limited points.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

​making it work doesn't mean higher scoring.

the way he runs an offense takes tons of time off the clock on each possession. more time taken during possessions limits the number of possessions you can have during a game. limited possessions means limited scoring opportunities. limited scoring opportunities means limited points.

Works well for Seattle (they had top-ten scoring offenses in 2013 and 2014) and worked well for us in 2013. In 2013 we had the second-most time taken per drive (3:00), third-most plays per drive (6), tenth-most yards per drive (29.8) and points-per-drive (1.99) in the league.​ If Jonathan Stewart plays like he did towards the end of year, and our new receiving additions are even marginally competent, those numbers could be vastly improved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt that they will be in question for it panthers tend to get scrutinized for playing well because of not winning anything yet that always gets thrown into the conversation

​lol it always comes back to this. Getting praise from the media is mostly market exposure and image. We don't have enough. Until we win a few superbowls we'll get nothing. So annoying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Works well for Seattle (they had top-ten scoring offenses in 2013 and 2014) and worked well for us in 2013. In 2013 we had the second-most time taken per drive (3:00), third-most plays per drive (6), tenth-most yards per drive (29.8) and points-per-drive (1.99) in the league.​ If Jonathan Stewart plays like he did towards the end of year, and our new receiving additions are even marginally competent, those numbers could be vastly improved.

​I think some people don't realize that, just because we run ball control, doesn't mean we can't score a lot.  IIRC, last season we were able to move the ball very efficiently, between the 20's.  The big problem was, we weren't scoring TD's, we were settling for FG's... and missing some of those.  We also had our fair share of 3-and-outs, but that's not a product of a ball control offense, that's just lack of execution/talent.  

If we have the ball for 9 mins, and score a TD, then our defense forces a 3-and-out, we have an opportunity to score again in that quarter.  If you have a good defense, a ball control offense can still easily score 14+ points per quarter, depending on how good the opposing defense is.  Even if you just averaged 10 points per quarter, you're scoring 40 points per game.  That's a shitload of points, and it's not even remotely out of the realm of possibilities for a ball control offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...