Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Recommended Posts

Even if we have Ward in the backfield with Stew and have Olsen, KB and either Ginn,Philly or Hill they cannot put 8 in the box' who can hold KB one on one and you definitely need help over top of our fast 3' Or we can go without Olsen when Wards in so we can play even faster with KB and two fast receivers' someone one on one deep... I love Hill all-day one on one if he catches the durn ball!!!! Same with Ginn lol catch the ball please now Philly is spot on but stay on your feet'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So why are we talking about cutting Tolbert to make room for Ward when the better option was mentioned in the article, cut Brockel?

I think if the coaches believe he deserves a roster spot giving him Brockel's spot would make more sense.

(Not that I'm advocating getting rid of either just yet)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone actually believes that Tolbert should be cut for this unproven undrafted guy... then you probably believed McNutt could be a #1.

​There's no correlation whatsoever. And look at how much each is getting paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So why are we talking about cutting Tolbert to make room for Ward when the better option was mentioned in the article, cut Brockel?

I think if the coaches believe he deserves a roster spot giving him Brockel's spot would make more sense.

(Not that I'm advocating getting rid of either just yet)

​There aren't 2 definite roster spots for the position. We have so much talent at WR now we might want to keep 6 so someone's got to go somewhere else. If Ward can truly be a beast lead-blocking FB, and Tolbert continues to be ineffective (and he was last season) then we should only keep him. I don't see any reason to keep Brockel, to be honest. All this is assuming that Ward is actually any good though. We haven't seen him in pads so this could possibly end up not being a debate at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
    • But is it about letting Bryce develop or about winning games? Bryce has not been good enough to be an uncontested starter. He just hasn't. How many times has last drive Bryce shown up for 4 entire quarters? Once in 3 seasons? You aren't going to win 9 or 10 one score games every season year in and year out. You may want Bryce in the last 2 minutes. I want that Bryce the full 60.  No one is saying you have to give up on him, but bringing in another QB that can do anything is not hindering Bryce. It helps the team and that's where the focus needs to be. If drafting Sadiq to plague the middle of the field would help out offense, but Bryce struggles to get pass into the middle of the field, is Sadiq a bad pick? Or could he be a good pick with a better option at QB? We can't be afraid to improve. QB, TE, OL, LB, DL, CB, S. It doesn't matter. The goal is SBs, not 5 to 8 years seeing waiting to see if Bryce can develop while the rest of the league keeps passing us by.  Sadiq is a nice option, but I think we have to address tackle if one we like is there because we are painfully thin after this year, a LB to general the field, and a true ball hawking safety that can set the tone in the secondary. Those 3 positions are bigger game changers than a TE that will likely struggle to make a round 1 impact in this offense. 
    • Lil Stanky 100% in the dot tonight... And our 2nd line has been our best offensive line this season. Maybe our 2C really was on the roster this whole time...?
×
×
  • Create New...