Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bobby Wagner seeking $10 million per year deal from Seahawks


RelaxImaPro

Recommended Posts

 

 

Wagner is widely considered the 2nd best ILB after Luke, so if you were wondering what the absolute floor for Luke's deal was... there it is.  We all know he's getting more than $10 million though, and anything in the $10-12 million range would be a bargain for us IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luke should be the best paid MLB in the game. There really is no question about that and everyone knows it. 

 

Young

as athletically gifted as any player in the league

super smart

seldom injured

High character

I mean, what else is there?

Party animal. *inside source*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lmao how would he do without that secondary? smh

​He'd do fine, if you ask me.  Wagner is a beast.  He's very football smart, and has great instincts.  I can't sell him short just because he plays for Seattle.  He's easily 2nd best, behind Luke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No non-passrushing LB has received a contract in excess of $10 million dollars a year since Willis did about 5 years ago.  3-4 outside LB's, edge rushers or whatever you want to call them, have received contracts in excess of $10 million but no LB who is not an edge rusher has received that size of a contract since then.  Having said that Wagner might get just over $10 million, idk, and that will be the floor for Luke.  If somehow Luke gets to $12 million a year average of the life of his contract, he will probably be the highest paid MLB for the next 10 years or so.  LB who don't rush the QB don't get paid, that's just how it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...