Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Graziano breaks down Newton vs Brees and Ryan


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

He starts by using a bit where he states things cam needs to do, win the division,   then pretends someone told him cam has already done that.  Then goes on to say what else can this guy do,  he's gone up and won against these other QBs that people say are better .  Sure he's not as good a pocket Passer but he more than makes up for that as a physical guy,   a runner.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually didnt like the analysis..  i think that guy made it sound like Cam isnt very good as a pocket passer, and I think Cam is better at that than what this guy is crediting him for.  NO quarterback is good because of the way they run, and this guy made it sound like thats exactly why Cam is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually didnt like the analysis..  i think that guy made it sound like Cam isnt very good as a pocket passer, and I think Cam is better at that than what this guy is crediting him for.  NO quarterback is good because of the way they run, and this guy made it sound like thats exactly why Cam is good.

You took it in about as much of a negative light as one can.  The analysis was spot on, and Cam isn't a very good pocket passer.  Can he get better?  Yes, but right now.  His stats show him being a pretty average QB passing wise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great point.    I would lke to add that there is another QB on the roster who was terrible over the middle--Kenny Pickett.  
    • I don't think this is the year for Carolina, unfortunately.  I think they will have to make a decision on the QB position-all we know is that Bryce has year 5, but a long term deal has not been signed--yet--and they would be smart to take a "wait and see" approach.  I have not kept up, and I see a path to upside for Bryce, but I do not think we have aggressively pursued a QB when our QB was mediocre to worse than mediocre.  yes, his numbers are improving--but he has adapted by eliminating what he does poorly and not improving on what he does poorly.  Just my take and I have no data to support this view.   Basically, we go as Bryce goes, so the approach is not to bring in a QB to have him compete until we find one, but it is to make Bryce as good as he can be--is that good enough? Season ticket holders buy the hope of winning rings, not winning 8 games. Last year, Bryce had a resurgence.  Take away TMac and Rico Dowdle.  How good was he?  I still have hope.  Not a hater of plan A, but a hater because we have no plan B.
    • Yeah man, I've been here for a very very long time. Couldn't even begin to tell you what year. Maybe 2004 or 5? I've never really been super active, just enjoy reading everyone's opinions and discussions. I'll chime in from time to time. I have had a few different accounts over the years. It's always been a fun place for me to check in on my favorite team. Hopefully we can keep the place running for a long while still. I also would like to recommend bringing back the Lovely Ladies page!
×
×
  • Create New...