Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jason Whitlock on PTI: Who compares to Jack Lambert? Luke


Recommended Posts

Olsen was on the radio yesterday and commented on this out of nowhere (he was not asked). Luke's position is more important to the defense than Watt's. MLB is involved in more plays and cannot really be avoided. He said you can run away from Watt, you can avoid throwing near Revis but you cannot avoid Luke. I would not trade him for any defensive player. I probably wouldn't trade him for any player period since I'm happy with Cam.

I agree that Luke can impact more plays, but he cannot change a defensive plan as much as JJ can.  We haven't seen a player like him since Reggie White.  Fast, big, strong, high motor....

JJ can completely change the way that you have to play offense, and while I agree that Luke can somewhat do that, it's not quite as glaring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Luke can impact more plays, but he cannot change a defensive plan as much as JJ can.  We haven't seen a player like him since Reggie White.  Fast, big, strong, high motor....

JJ can completely change the way that you have to play offense, and while I agree that Luke can somewhat do that, it's not quite as glaring.

That's a fair point. I guess in the end, I'm just glad we have the best guy in the league at a position group...who is also ridiculously young. I don't think many would argue that the best 3 defensive players at each tier is JJ Watt on the line, Luke in the middle and Revis on the outside (there's some room for argument in the defensive backfield). So for us to have one of those 3 guys is pretty special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watt was ranked number 1 for a reason.

"Splash" stats. Touchdowns, interceptions, forced fumbles, recoveries, sacks. Also his persona and he is way out there in the media. It's voted on by players, not GMs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luke's not as vicious as Lambert.  I think level of play is comparable, as is competitiveness and toughness.  But Jack Lambert was a mean SOB whose style of play would draw lots of flags in today's NFL.  To me, not a good comparison.

I gotta disagree here.

Luke may not talk as vicious as Lambert did but does he play and hit as vicious as Lambert?  absolutely.

And although this may be a product of the eras they played in, Luke is more athletic than Lambert ever was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Luke can impact more plays, but he cannot change a defensive plan as much as JJ can.  We haven't seen a player like him since Reggie White.  Fast, big, strong, high motor....

JJ can completely change the way that you have to play offense, and while I agree that Luke can somewhat do that, it's not quite as glaring.

How do you game plan for the Middle Linebacker?   Run outside.... NOPE... He'll get there.   You could throw over the top that might work.  Run right at him.  Not a good idea.  

Watts double team him, run opposite side of the field.....Quick hitters...  You can game plan for Watts but you can't game plan of Luke cause he is EVERYWHERE.... 

I love Watts, he is a great player but Luke is just as bad.    I think Watts plays are more highlight reel stuff compared to Luke.  But when that RB flies out of the backfield on 3rd down and catches a ball and Luke Nails him for a minimal to no game and they gotta punt.  That's a game changer.  When that RB is breaking for daylight and he comes off his feet.  Luke just nailed him again.  That's a game changer.

Best Part.   Really nothing you can to do to stop him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...