Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers vs Seahawks

Stickman2

By Stickman2,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted

You are simply ridiculous. Outside of Gronk, who are these "large amoutns of weapons" you speak of? Not to mention his clutch drive to put them up and his clutch 3rd down plays to keep drives alive. Brady absolutely exposed that defense, Seattle D didn't know what hit them. And you are trying to discredit him because he dink and dunked all game, but THAT IS HOW YOU BEAT SEATTLE. i get it, everybody hates Brady, but you are just being too naive and a homer. If Cam had the exact same game Brady had (including the game winning drive), we would talk about that FOREVER. Don't be such a homer.

Thank you for providing your point of view, I truly appreciate it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RelaxImaPro Enthusiast

RelaxImaPro

Posted
Posted

the first Cam interception was basically a punt so I wouldnt be worried about it. Luke Wilson tore our D up and the 3rd down defense was abysmal, but besides that it was a good game. Dickson still should have came back to the ball on that Chancellor INT and might have had a chance to break it up.

I really hate that reasoning, especially in a game like football where every possession counts, even more so for a playoff game where it's win or go home... every possession is huge.  Especially against a defense like Seattle, where your scoring opportunities are going to be limited to begin with.

Yeah, it was like a punt, but it was definitely something to worry about when you have a wide open KB for 20+ yards in the middle of the field.  Who knows?  Maybe if he doesn't throw that INT and instead finds KB, maybe we eventually turn that drive into a TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Peppers90 NC Community Regular

Peppers90 NC

Posted
Posted

And Cam was fuging amazing. Played significantly better against them than Rodgers, Peyton, and maybe even Brady despite having terrible WR and o-line compared to those QBs.

Amazing? Really guy? Are we setting the bar lower for Cam here or just redefining the word? That game made me feel good about the future but to say he played amazing is crazy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherphan96 Newbie

pantherphan96

Posted
Posted

I really hate that reasoning, especially in a game like football where every possession counts, even more so for a playoff game where it's win or go home... every possession is huge.  Especially against a defense like Seattle, where your scoring opportunities are going to be limited to begin with.

Yeah, it was like a punt, but it was definitely something to worry about when you have a wide open KB for 20+ yards in the middle of the field.  Who knows?  Maybe if he doesn't throw that INT and instead finds KB, maybe we eventually turn that drive into a TD.

3rd and 4 at our own 19. Unlikely that drive turns into a TD. And I would rather have Cam take shots deep downfield than dink and dunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RelaxImaPro Enthusiast

RelaxImaPro

Posted
Posted

3rd and 4 at our own 19. Unlikely that drive turns into a TD. And I would rather have Cam take shots deep downfield than dink and dunk.

Okay, let me try to say this even clearer.  KB was wide open.  A 20+ yard wide open pass isn't dinking and dunking.  He didn't have to try Sherman... Sherman was all over Philly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherphan96 Newbie

pantherphan96

Posted
Posted

Okay, let me try to say this even clearer.  KB was wide open.  A 20+ yard wide open pass isn't dinking and dunking.  He didn't have to try Sherman... Sherman was all over Philly.

i dont remember who was open on that play but regardless it wasnt a great pass by Cam anyway. my point is that for an INT, the one to Sherman wasn't terrible because it was far downfield vs in our own half. i would like to see Cam's decision making improve this season, and I'm hoping the OL and added weapons will allow him to improve accuracy and decision making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PhillyB Grand Master

PhillyB

Posted
Posted

Not adjusting after Chancellor jumped the line on the FG attempt on the first try and allowing him to do it again is inexcusable.

maddest i have ever been at any single moment during a panthers game. even madder than nakamura's cover zero against roddy white in 2012. i should have died of a brain aneurysm that night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cat Newbie

Cat

Posted
Posted

maddest i have ever been at any single moment during a panthers game. even madder than nakamura's cover zero against roddy white in 2012. i should have died of a brain aneurysm that night.

This would make a good thread. Maybe there has already been one about the maddest you've ever been as a Panther fan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By csx · Posted

      Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • kungfoodude
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control  Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst roster in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most voliate franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete diaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
    • Tr3ach
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By Tr3ach · Posted

      I think he has started to build a culture here.  I think if we had a qb with no limitations we would be seeing a lot more with the offense.  I think most of the coaches that come in and instantly win went to teams that were underachieving previously based on roster talent level.  Based on our roster talent,  we werent underachieving,  we were just bad.
×
×
  • Create New...