Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 5 things to watch against Buffalo


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think the main problem with Shula and why he gets so much blame on this board is a lack of growth and development the offense as a whole has seen with him. Lets compare what he inherited and what he has currently. 

2012 Offense 

QB Cam Newton Derek Anderson Jimmy Clausen

RB Deangelo Williams Johnathan Stewart Armond Smith/Mike Tolbert

FB MikeTolbert/Richie Brockel

WR Steve Smith Brandon LaFell Louis Murphy Armanti Edwards David Gettis Joe Adams

TE Greg Olsen Ben Hartstock Gary Barnidge

Tackle Jordan Gross Bryon Bell

Guard Geoff Hangartner Travelle Wharton (I believe he was a late season signing?)

Center Ryan Kalil

In 2012 the Carolina Panthers ranked 19th in scoring offense, 9th in rushing, 16th in passing. 

 

Compared to the 2013 Carolina Panthers (because everyone says Shula gets a pass for last year)

QB Cam Newton Derek Anderson

RB Deangelo Williams Johnathan Stewart Mike Tolbert/Kenjon Varner

WR Steve Smith Brandon LaFell Ted Ginn Dominick Hixon Marvin McNutt Tarvares King

TE Greg Olsen Ben Hartstock Brandon Williams Richie Brockel

Tackle Jordan Gross Byron Bell

Guard Geoff Hangartner Travelle Wharton

Center Ryan Kalil

In 2013 the Carolina Panthers ranked 18th total offense, 11th rushing offense, 29th passing offense, and 18th scoring offense.

 

Shula's year, where he inherited mostly the same offensive roster got worse in every offensive category except an improvement by 1 rank in scoring offense (lead mostly by a great defense that gave better field position.) You can pass the buck for the first year or two but after a while Shula will have to take the blame after improving the offensive roster.

Edited by Paintballr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And how long have we had the physical talent?  The general consensus across the league last year was that we had the poorest offensive talent in the league.  Frankly this year there are those who still who question our offensive talent.  Many of the guys we are expecting to be major contributors this year are rookies or very young.

 

Given what he has had to work with, he has done a very good job in my opinion.  You can be the best chef in the world but if you get handed a pile of crap it is probably still going to taste like crap.

fair enough. i still think we can agree that Shula has no excuse this year. we have the talent now. if the OL is really that much of a problem, scheme around it. if he cant, his head needs to roll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for pointing out what I've known for most of.my life.  

Coaching matters. I never said it doesn't.  I am also confident that if Gettleman felt any of our coaches weren't preparing and coaching up our players enough, he'd do more than suggest a change.

You know as well as I do, that when there is poor execution,  the mass response is directed to the OC.  He can't  hold the players hands, and make them execute better when it's game day.  

Let me be clear, that Shula isn't a favorite of mine.  I just know he also gets more blame than he deserves, and you are one of the ring leaders of that wagon.

nope, Gman said the staff is up to Rivera.  He will give his opinion but the choice remains with the HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula f*cking sucks, I can't believe people still defend him. After all the offensive woes the past 2 years (and his past track record) you would think people would get the gist. And no, I am not just hopping onto the Shula hate train. I've hated the decision to promote him ever since it was made. Dude is the most uncreative OC in the league and we still don't have an identity on offense. How many more years to we have to go through this?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow this is stupid.

Yes, Shula is much better than our old OCs. But what does that say about our organization?

Choosing between Shula and someone like Jeff Davidson is like choosing between having the flu and a terminal illness. You can survive with one but you'd much rather not have it.

Yes, some of it falls on the players. But year in and year out Shulas playcalling is mind bogglingly bad. Shulas inability to play call to our strengths or mask our weaknesses has been seen and criticized. He has improved as an OC. A lot. But he's still below average.

his play calling is actually better than most around here will give him credit for. He is also.more creative than most give him credit for. 

Your response of hand picking the worse OC the Panthers ever had is the weakest retort you could have come up with - but it does support your argument, so why would ya actually want to come up with a more solid example? Who cares, i don't.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula f*cking sucks, I can't believe people still defend him. After all the offensive woes the past 2 years (and his past track record) you would think people would get the gist. And no, I am not just hopping onto the Shula hate train. I've hated the decision to promote him ever since it was made. Dude is the most uncreative OC in the league and we still don't have an identity on offense. How many more years to we have to go through this?

at least your consistently biased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope, Gman said the staff is up to Rivera.  He will give his opinion but the choice remains with the HC.

I recall that perfectly clear. 

Just as Gettleman has no problem cutting players whom don't perform, i know he wouldn't just stand by doing nothing if he felt a coach wasn't performing. 

 

I can't believe anyone would believe otherwise. Your choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody in this thread is "giving him a pass"

 

Just different perspective, especially when taking the circumstances into consideration.

 

But bash away. Must you haven't deviated at all since before shula was promoted, so you'll ignore the circumstances as it doesn't support your hate.

Edited by pantherclaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I notice Jeremy said "play confusion, miscues, overthrows, wrong routes, slow play development" but the retorts defending Shula have mostly said "execution."

The problems on our offense are not just the QB missing a throw or the receiver dropping the ball. It's confusion, lack of urgency, and slow developing plays. Those things are ALL on the OC. We have experienced vets who, after many years in the league, suddenly look like they have no idea what's going on, running wrong routes, stopping mid route, etc. Do you think they suddenly turned stupid? It's the OC's job to get everyone on the same page, it's the OC's job to install urgency, quick-fire plays which have been THE most successful thing in our offense, and all indications are that Shula is failing yet again.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recall that perfectly clear. 

Just as Gettleman has no problem cutting players whom don't perform, i know he wouldn't just stand by doing nothing if he felt a coach wasn't performing. 

 

I can't believe anyone would believe otherwise. Your choice.

my beliefs are rooted in the only evidence available.  Shula has a job, Rivera is complacent with it and the GM said its not his call.

cant really do much else with that info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes I to account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as a treading water year. I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. 
    • What happened to King? Was he a no show?
    • think these smaller Qb's are going to have a much harder time convincing an NFL team to draft them. not saying a smaller Qb under 6 feet tall will not make an NFL roster .it will most likely be a UDFA contract more or less prove it deal.NFL teams have been burnt time & time again investing in these small NFL Qbs & i think  teams are now finally starting to realize that investing in these smaller Qb's under 6 feet tall is simply a bad idea  ...just saying 
×
×
  • Create New...