Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top Panthers PFF Performers- Preseason Week 1


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Carolina Panthers preseason week 1 PFF grades are out.

ProFootballFocus.com offers performance ratings on individual players throughout the year. Some value their grades more than others. For what it is worth, here is how they saw the Panthers player performances... 

Here is a look at the top 10 on offense 

Offensive summary

 Play CountsRatings 
Pos.#NameTotalRunPassRun BlockPass BlockOverallPassRushPass BlockScreen BlockRun BlockPenalty# of PenQB SkQB HtQB Hu
            
 RT60 Daryl Williams310012192.4  1.20.01.10.10-0   
 RG77O Martin Wallace270010171.4  0.70.00.60.10-0   
 LWR13 Kelvin Benjamin *16011501.12.10.00.00.00.0-1.01-0   
 QB1 Cam Newton *16011501.11.10.00.00.00.00.00-0   
 C64 Brian Folkerts20007131.0  -0.20.01.20.00-0  1
 RWR19 Ted Ginn705200.80.80.00.00.00.00.00-0   
 RG79 Chris Scott280012160.8  -0.90.01.60.10-0  1
 RT75 Tony Hills19005140.6  0.90.0-0.40.10-0   
 RT74 Mike Remmers *19005140.6  0.40.00.10.11-1  1
 RWR17 Devin Funchess18013500.50.50.00.00.00.00.00-0   

And here is the top 10 on defense 

Defensive summary

 Play CountsRatings 
Pos.#NameTotalRunRushCov.OverallRun DefensePass RushPass Cov.Penalty# of PenQB SkQB HtQB HuBPTksAssMTStops
 SS29 Dean Marlowe30161131.30.7-0.10.70.00-0    2  1
 SS41 Roman Harper *20100100.80.10.00.70.00-0    1  1
 DLT62 Terry Redden31151600.80.50.20.00.10-0  2 2  1
 RCB31 Charles Tillman *20100100.80.60.00.20.00-0    3  1
 MLB53 Ben Jacobs1513110.60.20.40.00.00-0  1 3  1
 DRE77 Rakim Cox24111030.6-0.20.70.00.10-0111 1  2
 FS38 Robert Lester34180160.50.20.00.30.00-0    2  1
 SLB93 Jason Trusnik3116780.40.3-0.10.20.00-0  1 11 1
 FS36 Marcus Ball21100110.30.10.00.20.00-0        
 FS33 Tre Boston25131110.20.1-0.10.20.00-0        
 

 It looks like PFF has two rookies, Williams and Marlowe, leading the pack. Not a bad start for the class of 2015. 


View full article

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has real value. 

It might not grade "your" player well, but on average, it's a set of skilled eyes grading things like blocking in a way no one here can.  It doesn't mean, in 20 plays, for instance that a career is over.  Game 1 of preseason isn't the end-all, be-all determinant (I saw a "cut Ealy" in the other thread and an all but "it's OK that Lee Ward had a -1" - turns out falling off your man in the hole isn't universally accepted) of a player's career.   Right now, positive is a nice thing to have, but a few negatives aren't catastrophic.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LULZ

Trusnik makes the list but Glanton doesn't. Classic PFF.

Rivera himself said he was dissapointed and disgusted by the defense. Glanton was a big part of that in terms of snapcount and many here said he didnt look great. Why is that "LULZ"? It fits with the coaches reaction and what happened on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...