Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bottom Panthers PFF Performers - Preseason Week 1


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not all Panthers players ranked highly on PFF this week. Here are their lowest ranked performances... 

Again, this is not the bottom line on how the players performed, but just one person's opinion. 

Bottom 10 Performances on Offense 

Offensive summary

 Play CountsRatings 
Pos.#NameTotalRunPassRun BlockPass BlockOverallPassRushPass BlockScreen BlockRun BlockPenalty# of PenQB SkQB HtQB Hu
 -4.50.0-1.42.10.0-2.3-2.96-11212
 QB14 Joe Webb30020100-3.2-2.70.40.00.00.0-0.91-0   
 FB85 Jamie Childers50050-2.00.00.00.00.0-2.00.00-0   
 LG65O Ricky Henry47001730-1.5  -1.30.00.7-0.91-01 2
 LT78 Nate Chandler31001219-1.1  0.20.0-1.40.10-0  1
 RWR12 Mike A. Brown26016100-1.1-1.10.00.00.00.00.00-0   
 LWR18 Damiere Byrd1801350-1.0-1.00.00.00.00.00.00-0   
 FB46 Lee Ward30120-1.00.00.00.00.0-1.00.00-0   
 HB43 Fozzy Whittaker *105401-1.0-0.1-1.00.10.00.00.00-0   
 TE-R80 Scott Simonson33013155-0.7-0.40.0-0.20.0-0.20.10-0   
 SLWR16 Philly Brown1501320-0.5-0.50.00.00.00.00.00-0   

Bottom 10 Performances on Defense

Defensive summary

 Play CountsRatings 
Pos.#NameTotalRunRushCov.OverallRun DefensePass RushPass Cov.Penalty# of PenQB SkQB HtQB HuBPTksAssMTStops
 SLB56 A.J. Klein *3417017-3.9-2.20.0-0.7-1.01-0    5123
 DLE94 Kony Ealy *3520150-3.0-2.4-0.70.00.10-0  2     
 WLB57 Adarius Glanton4423120-2.2-1.1-0.1-0.1-0.91-0    71 3
 SS42 Colin Jones3714221-2.2-0.8-0.2-1.20.00-0  1 4 12
 DRE90 Frank Alexander *3317160-1.5-0.8-0.80.00.10-0  1     
 WLB58 Thomas Davis *7214-1.5-0.5-0.1-0.90.00-0      1 
 DLE96 Wes Horton2211110-1.5-1.70.10.00.10-0  2 1   
 DRT91 Colin Cole *241590-1.4-1.0-0.50.00.10-0        
 LCB24 Josh Norman *2010010-1.2-0.40.0-0.80.00-0    2 11
 DRT65 Chas Alecxih3017130-1.1-0.5-0.70.00.10-0    1 1 

 


View full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though considered "unspectacular" by some,  Ealy had a solid season (particularly for a rookie DE).  Cut him?  Nah.  It's too early for such talk.  

Plus...do you remember all those receivers still on the board with so much potential and upside...?  That would be the worst part of it from my perspective. 

Lastly,  the PS would be the better option,  but even that would  be crazy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know its funny, sometimes when a player falls in the draft further than people think it doesn't mean you are getting a steal, sometimes it means you are getting a player that no one else wanted.  Look at ajayi this year, he dropped to the 5th round because of his knees and the dolphins thought they had a steal.  And now he can't even move past lamichael James on the depth chart.  Gettlemen might have made that pick with an eye on hardy and the situation we have now, which isn't a bad idea, but Ealy just hasn't panned out so far.

 

But I will saysay this, I thought the entire defense played like garbage during that game.  From Thomas Davis down to that Regis kid who essentially started.  I don't think it means anything particularly bad, just that they need to step it up next week.

Edited by firstdayfan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ealy has played one season. Did Greg Hardy or Charles Johnson look like All-Pro Defensive Ends after their first season? Give the guy two more full seasons before making ridiculous judgements like this.

2 players that went up from year 1 to 2, Kony need to do that. Nothing backwards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...