Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's put the Cotchery has little value takes to rest


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Even after strong suggestions otherwise,  you still have some fans,  even Huddlers,  saying Cotchery should be cut.  Well,  perhaps so---in a tunnel---but it's not going to happen this year.  The hints keep on coming, this time from David Newton's latest.

 

"The biggest thing is he brings such stability to that core," Rivera said.

 

 

"He’s taken a lot of these young guys under his wing and he’s explained how things need to be done and how to do things. That’s what you need from a veteran guy, and he’s taken that role."

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/15000/jerricho-cotchery-still-has-something-to-offer-panthers

Really,  Huddle,  how many times have we heard someone say that J-Co should be cut in favor of younger upstarts with varying degrees of suspected potential?  

This is big boy football being run by men.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical Rivera, if the only thing he brings is teaching what the hell are the coaches for.  We have a younger player in Bersin who could step in and do his role.  Allowing a younger player to make the team and learn but nope.  Let's keep slow ass Cotchery and Harper in there because they bring stability... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera talking him up really doesn't mean all that much either way.

At most, Cotchery will be around for another season. The plan clearly is to allow the younger guys to become our core.

Besides, all the "veteran leadership" in the world means diddly poo when said veteran is dropping game winning touchdowns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's tempting to want to root for the young guys, and I'm a bit torn about giving Cotch the spot, but I really do understand it.  A player in the locker room and on the field can lead in a way a coach cant.  I don't think Bersin can be that leader because he is one of the ones fighting to prove himself, fighting for a roster spot.  Sure he's been with the Panthers for all or part of 3 seasons, but he's not an ESTABLISHED player.  Ginn is just coming back...  Cotch is the obvious guy to be the veteran leader of this unit.  I've got some stats to prove it (smile....!, but we'll save those for the "roster trivia" quizzes...!)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's tempting to want to root for the young guys, and I'm a bit torn about giving Cotch the spot, but I really do understand it.  A player in the locker room and on the field can lead in a way a coach cant.  I don't think Bersin can be that leader because he is one of the ones fighting to prove himself, fighting for a roster spot.  Sure he's been with the Panthers for all or part of 3 seasons, but he's not an ESTABLISHED player.  Ginn is just coming back...  Cotch is the obvious guy to be the veteran leader of this unit.  I've got some stats to prove it (smile....!, but we'll save those for the "roster trivia" quizzes...!)

 

 

Younger guys are never given the opportunity if the old players are hanging around. IIt's the reason they got rid of Smith to let Cam grow.  Rivera's biggest weakness is this though and it's not going to change. Bersin deserves more time and so do players like Funchess and Brown and Cotchery is taking those snaps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know, I like Jerricho. But we need consistency. It's strange how he gets a pass, yet so many people harped on KB for rookie mistakes.

Personally, I would like to set the bar for the veteran leader of our WR core a little higher than a guy who coming in was supposed to improve our red zone offense, but only managed to muster 1 touchdown all season long. While also at the same time being responsible for the most costly drop of our entire season that directly lead to a tie game which resulted in a losing record for our team.

We've got a lot of talent on this squad this year, I would rather not waste a roster spot on a guy just because he is nice, and happens to be a veteran. If we can't rely on him when we need him the most, what's the point? Based on his performance last year, if it comes down to keeping Cotchery, or facing the risk of losing a young promising player, I think it's an obvious choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David Newton has a pretty good article on this, explaining Cotch's experience and gifts as a slot receiver and where he fits in the picture.

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/15000/jerricho-cotchery-still-has-something-to-offer-panthers

If we were only keeping 5 wideouts I could see the concern with keeping Cotch.  But if we go with 6, or even the amazing hinted at SEVEN wideouts, then I have no problem keeping him.

I'm pretty sure he will be working himself out of a job and his playing time will decrease over the season.  Rivera et al saw the benefits of letting rookies play & develop last year.  I think we'll see more of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact is,  none of our receivers have the veteran savvy of Cotchery on the field.   If they do,  they certainly haven't shown it.  J-Co's practical experience is not going to be replaced in a day by anyone else currently on the roster.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think about this for a moment.

Remember Tiquan Underwood, who didn't even make it past training camp with us last year?

He had a better season statistically in 2013 with Mike Glennon throwing him the ball than Jerricho Cotchery did for us last year.

Underwood: 12 games, 24 receptions, 440 yards, 18.3 average, 4 touchdowns.

Cotchery: 15 games, 48 receptions, 580 yards, 12.1 average, 1 touchdown.

By the way, Underwood is now playing in the CFL.

So yeah, let's hear some more about Cotchery's value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they were keeping Cotch as a #5 cool, but as long as he's on the active roster he's going to get snaps and that's a problem. That means he's taking snaps away from either Funchess, Ginn or Brown. 

 

Also, while we're talking WR's I really hope we keep Byrd over Bersin. Bersin showed Saturday he still can't fight through press coverage when he got jammed against the smaller corner in Ronald Darby. Bersin's inability to fight through press cost the Panthers twice in big situations against the Seahawks in the playoffs last season. I was a big fan of his last training camp but like Cotchery, I just don't trust this coaching staff enough to use him properly if kept.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...