Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lewis says Nick Hayden will start


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Did you watch the preseason games?

I definitely watched them...twice, and as much as I hate to say it Hayden improved dramatically throughout the preseason. He is still a rotational guy and not an every down starter in my opinion but I think once the other guys get acclimated to the system they will see more and more time on running downs and Hayden will probably be in there on passing downs as he does get some pressure on passing plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, I think they wanted him to back up Lewis. But since Kemo went down he shifted over to the nose tackle spot simply because he was the second best DT on the roster. Wait for the real defensive sets to begin before you judge him.

That's something I was wondering. Why didn't they right after the injury to Kemo move Lewis over to his spot and let Hayden move into that role? I mean Lewis is 6'2 and weighs a little over 300 lbs and Hayden 6'4 while in the 290's. I don't think that is where Lewis is best at but I think he would be the a much better fit at NT then Hayden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be surprised to see Hayden in most of the time. Philly doesn't have a traditional run game and uses more of a west coast offense with short passes instead of runs. Against that scheme Hayden won't be a big run liability and his pressure will be needed. Philly last year was 22nd in rushing at 106 yards a game and 4.0 per carry. No one had a 1000 yards with westbrook the most at 936 and 4.0 a carry.

As far as being a turnstile, he did have a pretty nifty spin move that resulted in him getting a sack.

I would expect Harris to get work as well. it isn't as if a DT has to know much about the playbook to push his guy into the backfield and tackle whatever he can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...