Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We could go 12-4 and still not win the division. Look at these easy ass schedules y'all


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

We're 3-0 and there are only 3 or 4 games the rest of the way we'd be underdogs at right now: @Seattle, vs. Green Bay, @Atlanta, maybe @Dallas depending on Romo. But the Falcons have an easier record. They only have TWO opponents left on their schedule with winning records: Minnesota and two games against YOUR Carolina Panthers. The Falcons might have a historically easy schedule and are going to rack up serious win totals. If we split with the Falcons, we might be looking at 12-4 and the Falcons might be looking at 12-4 or 13-3. It would be inexcusable if we don't go 4-0, but it would honestly be inexcusable if the Falcons don't start 9-0. They're 3-0 and their next 6 are Houston and Washington at home, New Orleans and Tennessee on the road, Tampa Bay at home, San Francisco on the road. Ho. Lee. Sheet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've honestly escaped being 0-3 by a fuging ass hair.  Sure, they've got a ridiculously easy schedule, but they're not going to win all of them.  Their 3 wins are honestly more about how the Eagles, Giants, and Cowboys absolutely choked away what should have been wins.

We're not great or anything, but neither are they.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could sweep them in December and their schedule is so easy they might finish 14-2. They play NOBODY.

Take julio out and they are a very average team at best. No easy feat as he has proven he can abuse even good,  around top ten, corners. But Norman proved twice last year the elite once can do it. 

So the question is more are they playing any elite corners. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...