Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers are a TRAP game for Seahawks


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

Yes this thread is two weeks early, but I don't care. Regardless of the outcome of the TB game and our record, all we are going to hear about is how the "dominate" Seahawks are going to easily win at home against the Panthers on 10/18.  We could beat Jameis 400-0 and we still will be underdogs to the Seahawks.

We are going to hear how bad of a matchup we are vs. their defense.  How they have never lost a home game to any opponent ever because of their 12th man.  We are going to hear how their game manager QB had the maturity and football IQ that Cam doesn't have.  And we are going to hear how they have beat us 5(?) times in a row.  

I think that Ron gets his first win after a bye and his first win against the Seahawks.  They are going to be cocky with a 2-2 record, and we are going to go in there and beat them by a TD.

What say you? 

5-0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 4-0/3-1 Panthers will be a trap game for the 2-2/1-3 Seahawks? I'm not buying it. Pamthers always play the Hawks tough and they know that. The media may overlook the Panthers, the Seahawks will not.

Having said that, I'm not entirely sure that they're a great football team right now. Don't think they're any better than they have been in the past. Should be a good game. Both teams play the same style of game. Which one will do it better? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes this thread is two weeks early, but I don't care. Regardless of the outcome of the TB game and our record, all we are going to hear about is how the "dominate" Seahawks are going to easily win at home against the Panthers on 10/18.  We could beat Jameis 400-0 and we still will be underdogs to the Seahawks.

We are going to hear how bad of a matchup we are vs. their defense.  How they have never lost a home game to any opponent ever because of their 12th man.  We are going to hear how their game manager QB had the maturity and football IQ that Cam doesn't have.  And we are going to hear how they have beat us 5(?) times in a row.  

I think that Ron gets his first win after a bye and his first win against the Seahawks.  They are going to be cocky with a 2-2 record, and we are going to go in there and beat them by a TD.

What say you? 

5-0

Agree , but I would like a beatdown for the all pains they caused us last few years. We match up pretty well this year with a weak OL. Just have to play mistake free football and we take the W.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kelvin Benjamin was the only reason 1 of those games was close last year.

People like to jack off how close we are to beating the seahawks but we've played 1 game in their place and they blew the doors off of us.

But we kept it close for most of the game despite being the more flawed team.

 

If we had Kelvin Benjamin I'd say we would dominate this game. A win by 2 TD's would be possible. But without him everyone will have to be on point against them. Plus the refs will have to be neutral which is hard to ask for.

This would be a good game for Funchess to make his mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...