Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina can't buy a win after bye week


X-Clown on 1

Recommended Posts

This is has been on my mind ever since I knew we were playing Seattle, in Seattle, immediately after our bye week.  Since 2011, under Rivera, we are 0-4 coming off of our bye weeks.  Seattle is vulnerable this year, but as of recent, we always seem to come out flat after our bye weeks.  I've referenced a Nov 2014 article that breaks it down a little more in detail.  However, I will say I liked that Rivera had these guys show up for film today, instead of giving them Victory Monday off.  Let's hope they stay hungry.

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/article9238565.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been hearing this bye week thing mentioned a lot lately.  At first I was thinking that it was more coincidence than substance.  After looking at the actual game scores though, it looks like there is something to this:

2011:  Titans 30 Panthers 3

2012: Cowboys 19 Panthers 14

2013: Panthers 6 Cardinals 22

2014: Panthers 13 Vikings 31

Three out of four of these were not even close.  Hopefully Ron makes some good changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been hearing this bye week thing mentioned a lot lately.  At first I was thinking that it was more coincidence than substance.  After looking at the actual game scores though, it looks like there is something to this:

2011:  Titans 30 Panthers 3

2012: Cowboys 19 Panthers 14

2013: Panthers 6 Cardinals 22

2014: Panthers 13 Vikings 31

Three out of four of these were not even close.  Hopefully Ron makes some good changes.

Youre missing a game... Playoffs, 2013.... We had a bye being the 2nd seed at 12-4.... Couldnt beat the zebras & the 49ers.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I decided to look a little more closely at our record following bye weeks.

First it's worth noting that under Rivera & Cam, we've never taken a winning record into a bye week.  (I'm disregarding the Jan 2014 playoff loss / bye as I think the playoff loss is a different category).

  • In 2011 prior to the week 9 bye, we were 2-6, with a 1 game losing streak coming into the bye.  Tennessee was 4 - 4 when we played them.
  • In 2012 prior to the week 6 bye, we were 1 - 4  with a 3 game losing streak.   Dallas was 2 - 3 when we played them.
  • In 2013, we were 1-2 prior to our week 4 bye, coming off a 1 game winning streak (the 38-0 blow out of the Giants).  AZ was 2 - 2 when we played them.
  • In 2014, we were 3 - 7 - 1 prior to our week 12 bye, coming off a 5 game losing streak.   Minnesota was 4 - 7 when we played them.

So, not only did we have a losing record in each case, we also played teams that had better records than we did at the time.

So... this year we're 4 - 0 and we will have a better record than Seattle when we play them, so, I'm really hoping we can break this "the team can't win after a bye" stereotype altogether.  This year is a totally different situation.

We're building a winning culture.  We've started fast.  We've got an 8 game regular season win streak going.  We've held tough to win close games we often would have lost in the past.   No need to keep hanging this expectation of losing following the bye on the team.

Let's expect the win, and let's hope Ron and the team don't start to believe this we can't win after the bye nonsense.  I'm glad they're not being complacent about it, but, it's really not the same situation this year at all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...