Seahawks fans concerned about their OL

[Captain Morgan]

saying Wilson, an elusive QB mind you, is on pace to be sacked 72 times, which would be the second

most in NFL history.

 

"Would you rather have sacks, or interceptions / fumbles. Pick your poison.

It is impossible to not see how atrocious this o-line is.

http://www.seahawks.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=115154&sid=b966451ef234e09c666a915aaf09c81c

 

Let's eat.

 

[nctarheel0619]

Well blame your GM for putting 3 players that played different positions in College on your O-Line.  That is remarkably dumb.  No coach can do that and expect his QB (no matter how shifty he is) to not fumble, get sacked, or not play up to par.    

[Nate Dogg]

After watching them play Detroit I'm really starting to like my prediction of 7-0 going into the Green Bay game.

[Cary Kollins]

as a poster over there said, when you have 9 out of 11 defensive starters on second year contracts, a makeshift offensive line is a reality

 

The Hawks gambled they could keep their defense intact while sacrificing other areas, one being offensive line which is arguably the most important unit on a team. Trading Unger for Graham is exploding in their faces as the Seahawk coaches are unable or unwilling to adjust their schemes to suit Graham's abilities.

 

 

 

[Bartin]

After watching them play Detroit I'm really starting to like my prediction of 7-0 going into the Green Bay game.

The over/under in the Carolina-Seattle game might be 20

[Davidson Deac II]

saying Wilson, an elusive QB mind you, is on pace to be sacked 72 times, which would be the second

more in NFL history.

 

"Would you rather have sacks, or interceptions / fumbles. Pick your poison.

It is impossible to not see how atrocious this o-line is.

http://www.seahawks.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=115154&sid=b966451ef234e09c666a915aaf09c81c

 

Let's eat.

 

They looked pretty bad against Detroit.  Although when I see a high number of sacks on a running qb, I wonder how many of those are due to his ability to keep the play alive, and not throwing the ball away? 

[Cary Kollins]

They looked pretty bad against Detroit.  Although when I see a high number of sacks on a running qb, I wonder how many of those are due to his ability to keep the play alive, and not throwing the ball away?

Some of those sacks were definitley on Wilson.

[ctrcat]

Been banging the drum for awhile.  They drafted like madmen from 2010-2012 and crap from 2013-2015.  Britt is probably the worst on a BAD line.

[L-TownCat]

The over/under in the Carolina-Seattle game might be 20

Looking back at the other regular season contests between the two it might be lower than that.  Seattle's defnse looks better somehow, our's is treading water but the Seattle O is running backwards like its by design.

[Chaos]

Ugh, it's the time of year to browse their forum already?  Those colors give me a migraine. 

[Mr. Scot]

Well blame your GM for putting 3 players that played different positions in College on your O-Line.  That is remarkably dumb.  No coach can do that and expect his QB (no matter how shifty he is) to not fumble, get sacked, or not play up to par.    

I hate the whole 'position switch' thing, honestly.

Granted, sometimes it works, but more often than not you wind up with Nate Chandler, Charles Godfrey or Sherrod Martin.

[Chaos]

And speaking of their forums, once they get past the Cincy game, I imagine they will be the first opposing fans of the year to show up here in droves, barking "Teh 12's, man, Teh 12's gonna get yall."

Bartscottcantwait.gif

[Carolina Cajun]

Man...I wonder if they are pissed that they didn't keep Remmers on their 53.  It's just another example of G-man finding a guy on another teams practice squad.  Someone should post Remmers Pff grades on their forum.

[t96]

Man...I wonder if they are pissed that they didn't keep Remmers on their 53.  It's just another example of G-man finding a guy on another teams practice squad.  Someone should post Remmers Pff grades on their forum.

They never had him.