Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Rivera or John Fox?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Before we go off the deep end for Rivera, we have to remember that the vast, the VAST majority of people on this forum last year at this time wanted Rivera fired.

Fox can take a crappy team and turn it around in about two seasons. He has a talent for rebuilding from nothing. His style is old school, smashmouth football and he builds teams that way. It makes them competitive quickly, built around a stout defense, a good offensive line and a good running back tandem. It works, but the teams won't last forever. If you own an NFL team and you need a new head coach to turn everything around, he's got to be high on your list.

Ron's turning out a darned good team, but the last few years have had their ups and downs. Slow starts and long losing streaks aren't good for a coach's longevity. Let's just say the issue is still up in the air for Rivera. This is the make or break year for him.  He'll either make his mark as a good coach or he'll go the route that many first time head coaches do, a few flashes of brilliance, a lot of hard lessons learned. 

Right now, Fox is the better, more experienced coach, with a specific niche for his skill set. Saying otherwise would be passing up on the eviodence before us in favor of blatant homerism.

 

Yeah, but that wasn't the question. As I recall, the question was who would you rather have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course the mood is right for Rivera now so he's the easy choice. But looking beyond this season's success I'm taking Rivera over Fox because of his willingness to adapt and evolve. Fox was stubborn 'til the bitter end. Exhibit A: his departure from the Broncos. Sure, it was mutual, but it came down to his lack of willingness to make changes to the team. At times, admirable. But not in defeat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but that wasn't the question. As I recall, the question was who would you rather have. 

That's tough to answer. Haven't seen the top end of Rivera's game yet. Fox, yeah, we've seen it and it can lead to the Super Bowl.

I'm going to sit back and enjoy the ride we're on. It's been a long wait, but I think Rivera's got it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly this is one of the lowest forms of debate (who's the better coach) when the team in question is 5-0, so I'm not surprised Gantt is serious about the point he's trying to make but I'm pretty sure there were no idiots running around imagining that Seifert was actually better when the Panthers were 5-0 in 2003, hot off a win against another undefeated team, the Colts. 

 

John Fox is ancient history here. The coaching staff is different, the players are different, the executives are different, the locker room culture is different. Ron is our guy in charge now. Gantt is grasping at straws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...