Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Falcons Fans are Scared


SamMills4Life

Recommended Posts

They have some pessimistic ass fans for a 6-1 team.

http://boards.atlantafalcons.com/topic/4035239-falcons-will-be-mauled-by-panthers/

Here's some of my favorites

"Saints mauled the Falcons, Panthers will have no problem with mauling us."

"I hate to say it but the Panthers are so much better than the Falcons."

"We are not winning this division."

"They are better than they have been and they were plenty good enough already. Really hoping to be wrong and eat crow but it doesn't look good at all."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have some pessimistic ass fans for a 6-1 team.

http://boards.atlantafalcons.com/topic/4035239-falcons-will-be-mauled-by-panthers/

Here's some of my favorites

"Saints mauled the Falcons, Panthers will have no problem with mauling us."

"I hate to say it but the Panthers are so much better than the Falcons."

"We are not winning this division."

"They are better than they have been and they were plenty good enough already. Really hoping to be wrong and eat crow but it doesn't look good at all."

looks like PanthersUnited became FalconsUnited on Saturday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers are worse than they have been in past years. Quite a bit worse actually.

They are big and physical, but slow and prone to mistakes. As long as we don't get sucked into playing their game we should be fine

what effing game are people watching that they scared of this defense? Bradford has missed two WRs in the end zone and if they would run Matthews and Sproles instead of Murray they'd be in the lead

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have some pessimistic ass fans for a 6-1 team.

http://boards.atlantafalcons.com/topic/4035239-falcons-will-be-mauled-by-panthers/

Here's some of my favorites

"Saints mauled the Falcons, Panthers will have no problem with mauling us."

"I hate to say it but the Panthers are so much better than the Falcons."

"We are not winning this division."

"They are better than they have been and they were plenty good enough already. Really hoping to be wrong and eat crow but it doesn't look good at all."

You're cherry picking. I can do that too, from the same thread.

"Panthers look very human tonite 

Panthers are worse than they have been in past years. Quite a bit worse actually.

Meh...Panthers aren't that good, .....

This team could be hitting on all cylinders when they play the panthers and just blow them off the field.

It's the Cam to Olsen show. We should be able to handle that

what effing game are people watching that they scared of this defense? 

That team is driven by their defense, if they don't get constant stops and turnovers then it's only a matter of time before Cam shows how stupid and inept he really is. The turd has 3 picks and his team is still up 7 points."

 

Every team has their optimists and pessimists, fan wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...