Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Along the Sidelines - Eagles at Panthers


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Good pictures.. as someone said a week or two ago.. put a damn "Next" button on your pages! If you don't know how, I will gladly assist!

Pretty sure that's purposefully not implemented to generate a few extra accidental page hits and ad clicks.  Considering this site is still free for those that want it to be, I don't have a problem with it.

Edited by Servant of Cthululelei
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exceptional work as always, appreciate it more than you know.

 

I do have to disagree about Cam making bad decisions, I didn't think any of the three picks were bad decisions. 

First was the habitual zebra screw job, if blame goes to a Panther it's Ginn.

Second was good, it was just a great play by Jenkins. Even Collinsworth admitted it was a good decision. 

Third was just lacking touch, BUT Funch did get 2 hands on it. 

 

Maybe one was questionable, the other 2 were fine. I thought he had a goof game overall and did a great job of playing with a short memory. 

I agree with you, he had a few off target, but he was throwing some nice passes too.

I think on the Funchess tipped pass, Cam just rushed the throw. But Funchess has to start making a play on the ball if it reaches his hands, even he will tell you that. I think he will continue to grow.

But it's  obviously not all Newton's fault for these tipped balls, blaming the speed of his throws for drops when Olsen hauls them in consistently is a little silly. These sort of things are unfortunately going to happen sometimes when you have to rely on Ginn as your #1 WR.

That Ginn interception should have actually been a reception anyway, as you can see in the image above from Jeremy.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not really. It all depends upon perspective. You can draft quality OTs high every year. They have one of the lowest bust rates by position. DTs, less so, but good ones still come along at a regular clip. With WRs, it's simply best to draft one in the first round if you want a legit play maker. Moreover, WR is going to set you back more than OT or DT at really all statuses, meaning JAG receivers are going to make more than JAG OTs and DTs, and elite receivers will make substantially more than elite OTs or DTs. I would also argue that it's much harder to find a franchise level OT or DT that can have an altering impact upon the game. So, if you don't believe they can, you may as well wait for day 2 or 3. That's why sticking to your board is probably the wisest thing to do. If you're not committed that the value is there, then what are you doing? Lastly, I don't think you should necessarily draft in a vacuum, but you must look at each team from year to year. People want to make them the same, but they're different. You have to start over every year and identify where the strengths and weaknesses are. You can't say, "Well we drafted [so and so] last year or two years ago, so we'll just draft this this year." That's not realistic and it can be highly counterproductive, especially in light of the reason that you should be trying to use FA to set up the draft.
    • If you read through his stuff, he's had a raging hate-boner for the Carolina Panthers the likes of which would make many long-tenured Huddlers blush. Every win was "yeah but" and every loss was "see I told you so".
    • Let me preface this by saying I've read WalterFootball on and off for 20 years. That's an indictment on my decision-making, and it's more than fair to be questioned.  However, the days of reading what's become weak ragebait have drawn to a close after he re-graded the 2025 NFL Draft's first round. He gave T-Mac a C on draft night. What was his re-grade for the NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year?  Carolina Panthers: Tetairoa McMillan, WR, Arizona – C Grade One-Year Grade: C+ Grade Tetairoa McMillan won Offensive Rookie of the Year, but only by default after Emeka Egbuka vanished in the second half of the season. McMillan was good, and was certainly limited by Bryce Young’s mediocrity, but there are still concerns about his work ethic and passion for football. If he doesn’t progress in the coming years, we’ll know why. Original Write-up: Wow, our Panthers source did not pan out for once. Jalon Walker was heavy chalk to go here, but the Panthers decided to draft a No. 1 receiver instead. While this fills a need, I’m concerned with Tetairoa McMillan’s work ethic, which is something you never want to hear from a first-round prospect, especially one who is chosen in the top 10. Bryce Young needs this, and McMillan is talented, but will he give 100 percent at the next level? Also, what about the defense, which was the worst in the NFL last year? https://walterfootball.com/nfldraftgrades2025.php
×
×
  • Create New...