Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Colts history be repeating itself?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I'm noticing some interesting historical parallels between this season and the Colts at the end of the Peyton Manning era.

Looking back at the 2011 Colts, you had...

- a losing season

- turmoil inside the organization

- an injured quarterback

After that disaster of a year, the team cleaned house. Team owner Jim Irsay replaced the GM (Bill Polian) the head coach (Jim Caldwell) and the team's franchise quarterback (Manning).

Fast forward to 2015. What do you see in Indy? 

- a season going badly

- turmoil inside the organization

- an injured quarterback

So could it be time to clean house again?

Let's examine...

Pagano is pretty much gone. Few doubt that. There was some thought that Grigson might be okay.  Recent stories, however, may be casting some doubt on that idea.

But what about Luck?

Surely, the team wouldn't dump its young cornerstone quarterback this quickly.

Would they?

Well, a couple of things to consider:

- New GMs and coaches often want their own quarterbacks, and Luck could be viewed as damaged goods depending on the severity of his injuries.

- Luck is expected to net a jaw-dropping contract in short order. Will a new coach and GM be willing to pay that based on what they're seeing right now?

- The Colts are likely to finish the season with a high draft pick, one that could be used to take a new, young franchise quarterback with no history or injury issues (and a significantly cheaper price tag).

- Even now, you could likely get a pretty good deal on draft picks and/or players in exchange for Luck. Might be just the kind of thing a franchise in need of a rebuild could use.

- There's also the crazy owner factor. Irsay is more than a little off, and he's already dumped one franchise quarterback who proved to have something left  in the tank.

So who knows?

My gut tells me that Pagano and Grigson will be sent packing, but not Luck. I don't see his injury being enough for them to bail on him just yet. And even with this season's struggles, there's still plenty of reason to believe he's a franchise quarterback.

Whomever is given the reins of the Colts future (Sean Payton has been speculated) will look to do a better job building around him than the previous regime did.

But could the Colts actually decide to start over completely?

I'd say it's possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO no way do the Colts get rid of Luck. As far as I'm concerned any new GM and or coach that comes in would be told very early in the process that Luck stays. 

My take also.

But to be fair, did anyone see them dumping Peyton Manning?

Yeah, Manning was hurt, but he also meant way more to the organization then than Luck does now.

Is it completely out of the question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take also.

But to be fair, did anyone see them dumping Peyton Manning?

Yeah, Manning was hurt, but he also meant way more to the organization then than Luck does now.

Is it completely out of the question?

Yes.  Peyton was like 35 already (at least) and had a serious injury that made it questionable he'd still be able to play.  Luck is significantly younger and his injury significantly less serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take also.

But to be fair, did anyone see them dumping Peyton Manning?

Yeah, Manning was hurt, but he also meant way more to the organization then than Luck does now.

Is it completely out of the question?

Yea I think everyone saw them dumping Manning...he's shot...and when he wasn't totally busted he floundered late in the season to screw it up for the Broncos.

His injury is pretty bad honestly...it is one of those where you barely even play through it...if you can't feel half your arm you can't put enough strength on throws because you don't know how much effort you are actually putting on it.

Also Luck had the "next Manning" overhype associated with him so it's really easy to replace Manning if you think you have 22 year old Manning as your draft pick.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...