Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opponents win/loss records


CRA

Recommended Posts

I haven't heard that angle since it was somewhat valid.

It's still alive and well in a NYT article this week:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/27/sports/football/carolina-panthers-stay-undefeated.html

They not only talk about our easy schedule so far, but talk about how our schedule helps us going forward - i.e. we play Green Bay at home... basically doing all they can to discount our record.

Here's an excerpt:

Carolina has also been helped by its schedule, which has been one of the easiest in the league. None of the six teams it has beaten has a winning record.

Carolina’s first four opponents, Jacksonville, Houston, New Orleans and Tampa Bay, were not expected to be very good. But most prognosticators would have expected trouble in Games 5 and 6 against Seattle (12-4 last year) and Philadelphia (10-6). Carolina was lucky to catch both of those teams in (so far) down years.

Next week, the Panthers face another good team on hard times, the Colts, who are 3-4. Then they finally face a really stern test, the unbeaten Packers. But again the schedulemaker has smiled: Both games will be at home.

Still, there is plenty of skepticism over whether Carolina is suddenly an elite team. The Patriots and the Packers remain the bookmakers’ favorites for the Super Bowl, and Carolina also ranks behind unbeaten Cincinnati and Denver, as well as Seattle, which is 3-4 but still earns respect from bettors off last year’s Super Bowl appearance.

Indeed, despite its impressive start, Carolina is far from guaranteed even a division title. The Falcons have just one loss, and in a scheduling quirk will play both of their games against the Panthers in the last four weeks of the season.

It would be an odd twist were Carolina to finish, say, 12-4 and wind up in the same spot that the 7-8-1 team did last year, as a wild card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's still alive and well in a NYT article this week:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/27/sports/football/carolina-panthers-stay-undefeated.html

They not only talk about our easy schedule so far, but talk about how our schedule helps us going forward - i.e. we play Green Bay at home... basically doing all they can to discount our record.

Here's an excerpt:

They need to look at the Falcons - nobody to worry about except the Vikings and us, and we don't count, thanks to our cupcake schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see they blamed Slavin for the goal like I did. 
    • See this is the problem, you say "can't get off the line quick" and "can't separate quick" but in reality it's "he can get off the line better and create more separation" which are two completely different things. If he couldn't get off the line or separate, he wouldn't have put up the numbers he did and end up a Top 10 pick. But he can get better, and maybe more accurately, consistent with them both, and that will take his game to the next level.  These are things that are also much easier to improve once you get to the NFL than things like being a poor route runner or having bad hands, two of his strengths. Thinking he can't get open in the short passing game also shows you haven't watched enough tape on him, as he was used in that role so much in college with little issue getting open and making plays. And him not using his physicality as much isn't even something that hurts his game because he's so much more agile than a player of his size should be, which he used to his advantage.  Instead of throwing passes where he'd go up and box out a player like a TE or Mike Evans does, they use his athleticism and put the ball in places that only he can get to it, and he usually does (and yes, he'll still be able to do that against NFL DB's with his catch radius). But now that he's in the NFL, I'd like to see him get stronger and add that to his game because it also will help him take his game to another level. As I've said before, if he doesn't improve on those things at all, I think he's a Top 25 WR in this league, he's already that good.  But I think he'll improve on those things and be a perennial Top 10 WR and in his prime is considered and perform like Top 5 guy in some years. My expectations for him this year at 800 yards and 8 TDs (although I do think he'll get to 10 TDs) with a real chance at getting to 1,000.  But those expectations are because I think Thielen will lead the team in yards with close to 1k and XL/Coker each end up in the 500-600 range themselves, just too many mouths to feed this year for a rookie to dominate yardage, especially if we're running the ball well again. But if Thielen can't stay healthy or puts up sub 750 yards, then yea, my expectations for T-Mac likely shift to getting to 1k as a rookie.
    • Svech only 1 goal behind the guy they've pretty much already given the Conn Smythe to...
×
×
  • Create New...