Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Finally, somebody has called Luck overrated


Jangler

Recommended Posts

Skip Bayless said the same. He's been overrated since entering the league. But like chknwing said, it's not Luck's fault. All of his turnovers the first few years were overlooked because they we're winning. Now they're not, so he's regressed. He's a gunslinger that needs to eliminate stupid throws. This season will do more for his growth than the last couple winning seasons, despite all the turnovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

...Luck is solid...dont bullsht yourself..... this is one of the first Cam vs Luck meetings... it'll go down like Brady vs Manning over the years... btw, i'm a Cam supporter....

 

Nah, Cam and Luck don't play each other enough for it to be a rivalry.  This is Cam's 5th year in the league, Luck's 4th, and this was the first time they've played each other.  Cam's biggest rival is Russell Wilson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Nah, Cam and Luck don't play each other enough for it to be a rivalry.  This is Cam's 5th year in the league, Luck's 4th, and this was the first time they've played each other.  Cam's biggest rival is Russell Wilson.

Yeah, unless Luck goes the NFC or we play the Colts in the Super Bowl every year then they will only meet once every 4 years. Can't really have a rivalry meeting that infrequently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Colts have fired their OC because of Luck. 

That is sad. 

Luck isn't a bad qb.  

He has always been more of a gunslinger, rather the more cerebral Manning type, that the media has said he is since before he was drafted. 

Gunslinger types tend to have higher interceptions, than then other capable qbs. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was Bomani Jones said something, in reference to the deep bomb to Ginn in OT that would have been the walk-off TD, along the lines of "that was the most athletically arrogant throw I've ever seen, and it hit him perfectly".


Luck will be a good QB for years to come, no doubt. He will need an improved defense to win against real contenders because he will throw more picks, being a gunslinger.

Wilson is Cam's biggest nemesis. That will change because Wilson, I don't think, has the staying power in the league to really push a guy like Cam. Winston will be another Josh Freeman. He'll look decent for a couple of years, but then just implode and be worthless.

Matt Ryan will be a big rival for Cam for the next 5-7 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...