Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trouble in Hollywood... Apparently major actor has been HIV positive for years .


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

The name of the actor is a secret but he's a well known actor and womanizer and has been HIV positive for years.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/celebrities/73945919/hollywood-superstar-hid-hiv-diagnosis-reports

Quote

 

A British newspaper has all but named a major A-list actor reportedly diagnosed with HIV, drawing ire from health campaigners.

The star, described as "a womaniser", has known of his HIV-positive status for years, but had not revealed his diagnosis to his sexual partners, Britain's The Sun reports.

The newspaper said it had chosen not to name the actor, who has previously dated movie and television stars, a glamour model and Hollywood personalities.

His lawyers were said to be bracing for potential legal action over his failure to disclose his HIV status.

"The reality is that if he's knowingly put women at risk then that's disgusting and it's only a matter of time before that becomes public," a source told The Sun.

Another source said friends had encouraged the man to go public before he was named by media, but he was worried about the impact on his career.

 

Many people screaming Charlie Sheen but nothing is know and media is digging all over it.  The name will leak sooner or later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Care" would be a stretch, other than the level to which I'd care about any human being.

"Curiosity" would best describe my reaction to this story, and not necessarily huge curiosity.

Once the name comes out - as I'm sure it will - I'll probably say "oh okay" and then go on.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JakeR6 said:

While there's a great risk of him passing HIV to females, it's very unlikely that a female gave him HIV. It's possible, but unlikely. He most likely contracted the virus by using a dirty drug needle or having sex with a male.

Drug use probably covers 90% of Hollywood and the only 'A list' celebrities that I recall hearing gay rumors about are Will Smith and John Travolta.

 

Blood transfusions were a large part of people getting HIV back in the 80's.   I'll take a guess and say Sean Connery! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree. All of these guys, and let's face it our coaches before Canales, too, were selected to be head coaches not because they had developed weak or underperforming teams during their previous stops. As a matter of fact, the only way to really move up in coaching is to start with a bad program, correct it, win and then move up when a vacancy arrives at yet another bad program, then do it again. Sometimes they are the HC, sometimes an assistant, whatever. But you've got to have some patience. And yeah, there's the Peter principal at work, too, sometimes. That states that people will eventually be promoted to their level of incompetence. It kind of waves its hand at the idea that sometimes people learn a lot from mistakes and grow.  It's really hard to win at this level of competition, this is the HC final boss level for football, from Peewee Leagues and Pop Warner, through junior high, high school, college and pro levels. It's tough and there are only 32 spots per year for the gigs (give or take a couple of mid-season replacement jobs).  We have to remember that Tomlin, Cowher and Knoll all inherited collapsed teams. And each rebuilt them and had them eventually wear out and fall down, too (okay, Tomlin is still holding strong, but entropy eventually catches everyone), but each took a time commitment and good management to rebuild. I wish we could snag onto the winning formula. But you're very right that we can't just change every two years and expect anything but the same restart difficulties each time.
    • Well, I think that's basically a Bryce thing. Dalton is not gonna be a significant media threat to him and is also a very capable backup. So does bringing in a Daniel Jones make a lot of sense if you are just gonna hear the chants for him every time Bryce struggles? IMO, it has been they are sold on Bryce and don't want a threat to his development. Dalton isn't a threat.
    • Mayfield was #1 overall and brought the Browns to the playoffs.
×
×
  • Create New...