Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fozzy Whitaker


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

If that were true, why was was CAP inactive, leaving Whittaker as the only option behind Stewart (other than Tolbert)?  I really don't get the insistence on keeping Fozzy active, or even on the team, when we got two young guys behind him that need reps.  He's had one or two good screen plays in his Carolina career, but otherwise has been ENTIRELY underwhelming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jeremy Igo said:

Seemed like a no brainer to put Fozzy in and throw a screen when the Titans were completely selling out.

Whitaker may be in the doghouse after that horrible block in the back penalty last week. 

I really don't understand why he's ahead of CAP... CAP is better in pretty much every aspect except receiving and we don't even use Fozzy in the screen game (though we should if he's going to be active anyways) so I don't see why he's ahead of CAP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Seemed like a no brainer to put Fozzy in and throw a screen when the Titans were completely selling out.

Whitaker may be in the doghouse after that horrible block in the back penalty last week. 

If that's true I expect Joe Webb won't see the field next week.  The Swiss Army knife cost us big time today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Barry McCaulkinor
43 minutes ago, Cuttinedge said:

If that's true I expect Joe Webb won't see the field next week.  The Swiss Army knife cost us big time today. 

Yes, he made a mistake. Cost us big time? We won by 17 points. Good teams overcome penalties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Seemed like a no brainer to put Fozzy in and throw a screen when the Titans were completely selling out.

Whitaker may be in the doghouse after that horrible block in the back penalty last week. 

So we won't be seeing Joe Webb on special teams anymore by this logic, right? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Webb has been our most consistent Special Teamer (in coverage at least). He made one mistake this season, but bailed us out multiple times. He's not going to end up in any doghouse. His one mistake just came at a 'costly' time (where we had a big return).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
×
×
  • Create New...