Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You are not a bad fan if you think we're going 16-0. In fact, I bet most players and coaches think it too.


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

A team with no weaknesses on offense or defense that's won 15 in a row is supposed to lose to one of these garbage NFC South teams or the Giants? Are you people really serious with that or are you doing a lame "Don't jinx it!" thing? I bet you Cam, Luke, etc will be expecting wins the last 5 games of the season. If it's good enough for them, why isn't it good enough for you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, King said:

Literally just parroting what Rivera and most fans are saying while being condescending.

If you're not excited to see your team go 16-0 (which is a MUCH rarer achievement than winning a Superb Owl), fug off.

Or if you are excited, stop acting like a coach on media day.

That was the point wise guy, that the teams is not looking to go 16-0, just taking one game at a time. If it happens great, if not.it wont be the end of times. It'd be worse if the looked past an opponent and took them lightly and lost..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the romo-led cowboys were probably the hardest team left on our schedule. falcons and giants have the best chance of pulling off the upset at this point, both at home.

not even worried though. as long as rivera and co. take them seriously i can laugh at their squads on message boards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, King said:

Literally just parroting what Rivera and most fans are saying while being condescending.

If you're not excited to see your team go 16-0 (which is a MUCH rarer achievement than winning a Superb Owl), fug off.

Or if you are excited, stop acting like a coach on media day.

Exactly. All of these Huddlers pretending to not be excited about this possibility just because of what Rivera is saying. Rivera is just saying that to not give anyone bulletin board material. I guarantee you he's thinking about is as is the entire locker room. Us on the other hand? We can say whatever the hell we want and I don't think it's going to bother Drew Brees or Eli Manning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

the romo-led cowboys were probably the hardest team left on our schedule. falcons and giants have the best chance of pulling off the upset at this point, both at home.

not even worried though. as long as rivera and co. take them seriously i can laugh at their squads on message boards.

Maybe the Giants, just possibly if Good Eli shows up.  They do put points on the board.

Maybe the Saints dome voodoo magic.  Possibly.

The Falcons?  They don't have a shot in hell in either game:

1. The Falcons are Cam's b***ch.

2. They are still soft as hell.  We win those games on the LOS alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm usually really reserved, skeptical, and negative about stuff but yea fug that...we are the team to beat period no more of this oh no trap game or whatever bullshit.

We have what it takes to go 16-0 as long as we keep playing mistake free football(from the turnover perspective) Cam hasn't thrown a pic in how many games? If our D keeps holding teams under 20 and Cam keeps doing Cam we got this.

STs is the only real concern going forward as it always seems to be this teams Achilles heel but if Gano kicks it out of the end-zone and Nortman doesn't poo hte bed we'll be ok...BTW we should really take a luxury draft pick this year and draft the best punter...I mean if we can get a punter like the one Dallas has that would go hand in hand with this teams style...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PhillyB said:

the romo-led cowboys were probably the hardest team left on our schedule. falcons and giants have the best chance of pulling off the upset at this point, both at home.

not even worried though. as long as rivera and co. take them seriously i can laugh at their squads on message boards.

It was between the Cowboys with ROmo and the Giants in my opinion for hardest game after the tough 4 game stretch. Seeing how bad we crushed them with Romo in the game makes me think the Giants game could be tougher but maybe we're just this damn good and we'll crush them too. What a season man I fuging love this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...