Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is anyone worried Stew might get burnt out?


FuFuLamePoo

Recommended Posts

Been a concern of mine the past few weeks.  Dude is a tank and is running so fuging hard, but I'm kinda concerned he could be burnt out come playoff time.  I just don't get why he was still carrying the rock when we were up like 20 last week.  There may be a thread on this idk.  Obviously I think we're going 19-0 but I'm just kinda scared Stewart might get burnt out.  Wish someone like CAP or Fozzy could earn just a few carries a game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope we can get CAP or Weg rolling soon. One of those two could be our "Rawls" like the Seahawks found in him with Lynch going down. Don't want either of them to replace Stew this year obviously since Stew is playing as well as any back in the league and just chugging along, but I'd love to establish a really solid change of pace back. Fozzy isn't cutting it and if we lock up the 1 seed I don't want Cam running or Stew getting 20+ carries but still need that rushing attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to agree with wanting more carries for CAP and/or Wegher, espec. when we have a good lead.  Question:  who do you deactivate to make it happen?  Fozzy?  Bersin? One of the ST guys?  We seem to be keeping extra rotational guys for our defense, which means offense is getting fewer guys activated...  It's been working, and it's hard to figure out what might change to get CAP or Wegher playing time.

Would you deactivate Fozzy for CAP?  Fozzy doesn't seem to have contributed much this year, but he's not gotten alot of snaps either.

Tough dilemma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Fozzy, I do. But something isnt right with him ever since he got banged up. Idk if he is still hurt or what but he is getting hardly any snaps and not being super productive in his chances. I believe it would do him some good to step down and heal some more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
×
×
  • Create New...