Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is 12 in the huddle no longer a penalty?


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Just now, CarolinaSamurai said:

Only penalty if you line up 12

No, it's a penalty if 12 are in the huddle.  The refs were just screwing up today.  I don't feel bad about it because they also gifted the Saints two fumbles (or at the very least, 1.  Stewart's was close enough I won't call foul on it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

No, it's a penalty if 12 are in the huddle.  The refs were just screwing up today.  I don't feel bad about it because they also gifted the Saints two fumbles (or at the very least, 1.  Stewart's was close enough I won't call foul on it).

How in the heck did they rule that "Olsen" catch a fumble? That's been called an incomplete pass in every game I've seen this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

No, it's a penalty if 12 are in the huddle.  The refs were just screwing up today.  I don't feel bad about it because they also gifted the Saints two fumbles (or at the very least, 1.  Stewart's was close enough I won't call foul on it).

One of fox retired official said that about the no calls. Idk why but I believe him sorry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...