Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 3 Reasons The Panthers Lost Today


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SportsCrazie4172 said:

If it makes anyone feel better about losing today as this does for me..Falcons will need a LOT of things to happen in order to make playoffs..beating an undefeated team doesn't come on a trophy anywhere..

 

 

CXROD45UkAA2t3e.jpg

That doesn't make me feel any better about our problems. The defensive line performance and bene's injury are probably going to cost us a super bowl this year. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RJK said:

no pass rush, no pass protection, and they got away from running the ball like they were getting blown out

Agree on all points. 

If you can run, but can't pass protect, why not just continue running? CAP was gashing ATL for big gains. The read option was hit or miss. 

Would add that I hated outside leverage as a CB. Any real DB wants to bump and run, taking away the inside routes and forcing a pass over my head but before the sideline. Matt Ryan was content with the short slant routes and getting first downs. What was the ToP ratio?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

That doesn't make me feel any better about our problems. The defensive line performance and bene's injury are probably going to cost us a super bowl this year. 

well then I guess you won't be watching any more games if you think we won't win it all..

I however won't let one game define our season..

I hate to say it but we have the worst fan base..even Steph Curry commented on how everyone is tripping over our FIRST loss..most didnt even think we would be over .500 but because we lose one game then all hope is lost..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Montsta said:

Didn't Atlanta beat us in another heartbreaking game with nothing but slants?

Hopefully McDermott does some homework and doesn't let it become a trend for other teams to exploit as well. 

That was Chicago, where Josh Norman literally gave Brandon Marshall 7-10 yards cushion with outside leverage all the way down the field. They kicked a FG to win.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...