Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 3 Reasons The Panthers Lost Today

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
Posted
Just now, Navy_football said:

That was Chicago, where Josh Norman literally gave Brandon Marshall 7-10 yards cushion with outside leverage all the way down the field. They kicked a FG to win.

Oh thanks that's what I was thinking of. I don't know why I thought it was Roddy White for some reason. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Montsta said:

Didn't Atlanta beat us in another heartbreaking game with nothing but slants?

Hopefully McDermott does some homework and doesn't let it become a trend for other teams to exploit as well. 

Man slants always beats this zone defense for YEARS. Don't hold your breath for a change

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chknwing Veteran

chknwing

Posted
Posted

this was a strategic loss by Ron.  he knew there was no way anything atl did could stop them.  so he gave the other playoff teams he may face game tape on how to beat the panthers.  They will use atls game plan and fail miserably.  Ron has said repeatedly in press conference the goal is not 16-0. the goal is the superbowl.

This is what I believe as in no way Carolina actually got beat by the mangina of a team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, beastson said:

Man slants always beats this zone defense for YEARS. Don't hold your breath for a change

That technique can work when your DBs are better athletes and can close to make a break up. Players like Tillman and Jones aren't built for that. 

i think Nick Saban uses teaches the outside leverage technique in man to man. But, you know, he does have better athletes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

That technique can work when your DBs are better athletes and can close to make a break up. Players like Tillman and Jones aren't built for that. 

i think Nick Saban uses teaches the outside leverage technique in man to man. But, you know, he does have better athletes. 

But even Norman was getting killed by Julio on them slants. The soft zone with no press coverage is terrible and needs to stop if this team plans on winning a SB

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
beastson Newbie

beastson

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Agree.

Bend but don't break scheme. The whole goal of our defense is to not get beat deep or give up the big play which happened with Julio so that was a fail, but for the most part it works. However since Ron/Sean took over particularly the last 2 years of the playoffs, teams say ok well we'll just slant you and dink & dunk down the field and its been our consistent weakness

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...