Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2016 Opponents Set


Montsta

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Montsta said:

And once again we play Seattle in Seattle. What the fug is the deal with that?

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/18328/2016-carolina-panthers-home-and-away-opponents-determined

you going to try to make the Oakland game? one of my colleagues at work went to see GB there this year, said the crowd was friendly enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

you going to try to make the Oakland game? one of my colleagues at work went to see GB there this year, said the crowd was friendly enough.

Definitely. Oakland isn't nearly as bad as the Candlestick crowd. Levi's isn't much better either. 49ers fans are a violent bunch man. Douchebags. 

Oakland fans are passionate and talk a lot of poo but at the end of the day they seem more exhausted from sucking more than anything else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mother Grabber said:

you going to try to make the Oakland game? one of my colleagues at work went to see GB there this year, said the crowd was friendly enough.

i would love to see roaring riot mobilize to take over one of the traditional hardcore fanbse areas like oakland. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Count me in for Denver for sure. 

I got a buddy who lives out there. So I should be able to stay at his place. 

I can't decide if I want it to be an early season game or a late season game. If I go out there, I'd love to do some skiing. However sitting in a snow filled stadium doesn't sound very appealing, but I guess there is a first time for anything right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, uncfan888 said:

David Newton is a dumbass. Talking about next year's opponents nine months before the season..  May as well throw darts at a dartboard 

He didn't really say that Atlanta and Tampa will be improved next year.  He said they are showing improvement, which I took to mean they showed improvement this year.  And he is right, both teams did show some improvement this year. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

He didn't really say that Atlanta and Tampa will be improved next year.  He said they are showing improvement, which I took to mean they showed improvement this year.  And he is right, both teams did show some improvement this year. 

 

What does that have to do with what I said though? The nfl is notorious for being different year to year.  It's pointless to talk about next year's schedule before the draft,  free agency, OTAs,  and all that good stuff cuz you don't know what teams will look like 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...