Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers vs. NFC West in the Playoffs


Seamonk

Recommended Posts

I thought it was interesting that we've only played the NFC West in the playoffs since losing the NFCCG to Seattle during the 2005 Season.

2005 - NFC Championship - @Seattle (Lost Super Bowl to Steelers)

2008 - NFC Divisional - Arizona (Lost Super Bowl to Steelers)

2013 - NFC Divisional - San Francisco (Lost NFCCG to Seattle)

2014 - NFC Wildcard - Arizona

2014 - NFC Divisional - @Seattle (Lost Super Bowl to NE Deflated Balls)

Judging by how the playoffs are projected to play out with a lot of people picking Seattle over Minnesota and Arizona possibly winning in Divisional, it looks like it will be more of the same.

Doesn't matter because we can beat any team in our way, just thought it was interesting.

#KeepPounding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought 2005 was a good year, we just had too many injuries going into that game. Lost Deshaun Foster against Chicago and Nick Goings in the game. We were down to our 4th running back off the practice squad. "Just triple cover Steve Smith" and it worked.

2008 was just unfortunate. 2013 sucked but it was venturing into new territory and set us up for our success now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Seamonk said:

I thought 2005 was a good year, we just had too many injuries going into that game. Lost Deshaun Foster against Chicago and Nick Goings in the game. We were down to our 4th running back off the practice squad. "Just triple cover Steve Smith" and it worked.

2008 was just unfortunate. 2013 sucked but it was venturing into new territory and set us up for our success now.

They used 4 levels of coverage on Smitty.  

4!!!!!

still had a TD.  (Punt return but watevs)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2013 was very disappointing.  I remember someone posting here after the Eagles chokejob to NO "the Saints just knocked us out of the playoffs" because our divisional opponent just became San Fran instead of an easy to beat Eagles team that we would have crushed.

Couldn't punch it in from the 1 yard line, awful, and no meaningful penalty for going over the O-line and kicking Cam in the head.

Pundits were by and large picking the 49ers over us, much to the chagrin of this board, and unfortunately they were right.  We'll never hear the end of it if we lose at home to the Seahawks next week in a similar anemic offense scenario, really making it a must win for so many reasons.

 

Looking back Vegas had us as two point dogs, in our own house, to the niners!  Sadly we didn't even come close to covering.  This time I imagine we'll be two point favorites over Seattle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Seamonk said:

I thought 2005 was a good year, we just had too many injuries going into that game. Lost Deshaun Foster against Chicago and Nick Goings in the game. We were down to our 4th running back off the practice squad. "Just triple cover Steve Smith" and it worked.

2008 was just unfortunate. 2013 sucked but it was venturing into new territory and set us up for our success now.

If it wasn't for our RB injuries, we could have won the SB in 2005. All Seahawks had to do was blanket Smitty to win, we had nothing else left on offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Seamonk said:

I thought it was interesting that we've only played the NFC West in the playoffs since losing the NFCCG to Seattle during the 2005 Season.

2005 - NFC Championship - @Seattle (Lost Super Bowl to Steelers)

2008 - NFC Divisional - Arizona (Lost Super Bowl to Steelers)

2013 - NFC Divisional - San Francisco (Lost NFCCG to Seattle)

2014 - NFC Wildcard - Arizona

2014 - NFC Divisional - @Seattle (Lost Super Bowl to NE Deflated Balls)

Judging by how the playoffs are projected to play out with a lot of people picking Seattle over Minnesota and Arizona possibly winning in Divisional, it looks like it will be more of the same.

Doesn't matter because we can beat any team in our way, just thought it was interesting.

#KeepPounding

Yes, the refs pretty much jobbed us against the 9ers in 2013, but we lost because we couldn't score points. We couldn't get in from the 1 yard line.

2008 remains the worst and most painful for me. That game was a disaster unfolding slowly in front of you. I wanted Jake pulled after INT #2, just had a bad feeling after that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Camvp said:

2013 was very disappointing.  I remember someone posting here after the Eagles chokejob to NO "the Saints just knocked us out of the playoffs" because our divisional opponent just became San Fran instead of an easy to beat Eagles team that we would have crushed.

Couldn't punch it in from the 1 yard line, awful, and no meaningful penalty for going over the O-line and kicking Cam in the head.

Interesting how, like Seattle this weekend, the 49'ers had to go to a COOOOLD place before trecking over to play us, and they didn't exactly come out of the gates flying either, a combination of what you said along with questionable refereeing and other things meant that the 49'ers were ahead at HT. I'm beyond certain that if Seattle won and started the game like the 49'ers did, we'd hang 20-30 points on them by half time, no way would we get stuck in the redzone like we did against the 49'ers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kuhndog94 said:

I'd like to forget 2005 and 2008. I'd also like to forget the rigged 2013 game to set up a NFC West showdown in the NFCCG.

2008 was the year that still irritates me to this day. How did Fox not realize, at some point, that Delhomme needed to be pulled! I would take three more years of Clausen just to forget this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Apotheosis said:

2008 was the year that still irritates me to this day. How did Fox not realize, at some point, that Delhomme needed to be pulled! I would take three more years of Clausen just to forget this game.

Other than the last minute Super Bowl loss, the AZ game with Jake is the most painful memory when it comes to the Panthers.  

I was sure that team was going to go deep into the playoffs. 

Not so much.

And for that, the Cardinals are on the Panthers 2015-2016 revenge tour schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll never forget THE Cardinals game. 

We had a band at our tailgate off Moorehead, Jaeger-bucket was being passed around, rowdy as hell....

Game starts, we march down field, still looking like the best team in the league in spite of Jake in his twilight; Stewart punches it in.  Yahooo!

Then sh*t hit the fan, lost my phone, Jake happens, and everyone realizes an era had ended.  I try to forget those next 2 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...