Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Marshawn Lynch doesn't play on Sunday, 54% of their total offense last time we played them will be out


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Lynch ran the ball 17 times for 54 yards and a touchdown against us with 1 catch for 0 yards. Very pedestrian numbers, but I would still rather face that guy named Christine at running back than him.

 

But there's an X-factor that hardly anybody is talking about this week. The Seahawks won't have Jimmy Graham for sure. He kinda killed us for 8 catches for 140 yards back in October. Luke Willson had a big catch against us a couple of years ago, but I'm much happier to see Willson than Graham.

 

Between Lynch and Graham, the Seahawks would be looking at losing 194 of their 356 total yards. Russell Wilson only threw for 101 yards to non-Jimmy Graham receivers back in October.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Wyank said:

Will Luke be playing? He was out against vikes right?

Luke is questionable. He was out against the Vikings, and was in limited practice. about 50/50 to play Sunday.

Edit: According to the Pete Carroll news conference about an hour ago, Willson should be good to go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Lynch ran the ball 17 times for 54 yards and a touchdown against us with 1 catch for 0 yards. Very pedestrian numbers, but I would still rather face that guy named Christine at running back than him.

 

But there's an X-factor that hardly anybody is talking about this week. The Seahawks won't have Jimmy Graham for sure. He kinda killed us for 8 catches for 140 yards back in October. Luke Willson had a big catch against us a couple of years ago, but I'm much happier to see Willson than Graham.

 

Between Lynch and Graham, the Seahawks would be looking at losing 194 of their 356 total yards. Russell Wilson only threw for 101 yards to non-Jimmy Graham receivers back in October.

 

 

Also Lockette is out for the year. Didn't he have that big catch against us over Coleman?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't expect much from our front 4, so a steady mix of blitzes and zone play is key on defense. If we can get to Wilson early with our blitzes or even our front 4 [won't happen, but I like surprises lol] and put a couple of good hits on him, that will set the tone. This goes without saying, but also we gotta stop the run 

Wilson is a star and is one of the best players in the league, but his strength is still when he rolls out. If we keep him in the pocket, he'll still hit his underneath passes and lob his occasional hand grenades, but he won't make any game changing plays. 

On offense, one word => Remmers and the oline.

If we protect Cam, I don't care who plays defense for them, we will torch them. And they are an outstanding defense, but that's how much I like where our offense is now. Only game we lost, our Oline was manhandled. Our O-line vs Their dline is what will determine this outcome imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lynch has been a non-factor all season, even when he was healthy. A revamped O-line made up of cast-offs, converted D-linemen, and a prayer, cast the entire team into chaos for the first half of the season. They have gotten better and that combined w/the fact that your defensive ends are not cause for concern is a real red flag for you guys. You've got some great linebackers and d-backs but those ends are going to be your downfall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WeAre12 said:

Everybody gave Wilson problems in the first half, that stat has been reversed.

Normally I'd say our DE's aren't anything to worry about, but a week off is huge for them Especially Allen. I hope you eat a bag of poo with your crow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...