Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offense and Momentum


Davis83

Recommended Posts

Forgive if already mentioned, but this crap where we start huddling and losing momentum sucks.  1st half, we pretty much ran a no huddle offense and moved the ball at will.  2nd half we're in the huddle every play and having to take TO's cause the play is late.  I know they are trying to eat the clock, but you can accomplish that in the no huddle too.  My god man, when the other team starts scoring, you have to let Cam do his thing and score some points too.  31 in a half - zip in the 2nd...sometimes we look like we are playing Fox ball again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get the complaint, but the way things were going in the second half I can't feel too good about any strategy that potentially leaves more time on the clock.

Who says there would be more time though? More first downs and longer drives take time as well, and it would be irrelevant with more points on the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Who says there would be more time though? More first downs and longer drives take time as well, and it would be irrelevant with more points on the board.

And what if you don't?  Then what happens to your defense?

Heck, even if you do, your defense doesn't get much rest at a time when it looked like they needed it badly.  On the flipside, a slow sustained drive not only rests your defense, but wears on theirs.

It's basically the Chip Kelly approach, but remember Kelly wore his own defense out as much as he did the other team's.

Again, I understand the idea.  I just can't get behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get the complaint, but the way things were going in the second half I can't feel too good about any strategy that potentially leaves more time on the clock.

Agree we needed to eat the clock up. Worse things the Panthers could have done is risk turning the ball over.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get the complaint, but the way things were going in the second half I can't feel too good about any strategy that potentially leaves more time on the clock.

The Panthers run more time off the clock when they allow Cam to go no huddle and make adjustments at the line. Look at the drives. I would expect the coaches to know that. Not to mention Cam is more effective out of the no huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The announcer pointed out how when you slow play it disrupts the flow of the offense, and it was completely true in our case. How many timeouts did Cam have to waste not to get a delay of game? 

 

The second half was so frustrating, we were running on 1st and 2nd and hoping Cam can save us on third and long. Not only the offense but the defense went to a complete soft coverage. McClain and Finnegan were getting abused 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no excuse to slow the reins on your offense when it just dropped 31 in the first half.  NONE.   This defense has holes, when one is exploited you need points on the board to take the brunt of the damage.   We have the MVP on our team and we handcuffed him for half the game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

And what if you don't?  Then what happens to your defense?

Heck, even if you do, your defense doesn't get much rest at a time when it looked like they needed it badly.  On the flipside, a slow sustained drive not only rests your defense, but wears on theirs.

It's basically the Chip Kelly approach, but remember Kelly wore his own defense out as much as he did the other team's.

Again, I understand the idea.  I just can't get behind it.

Not necessarily. The Chip Kelly approach is to run the play as fast as possible. We could run the no huddle and have Cam sit there at the line reading the D and then not snapping it until the play clock is low and time is still running off. No huddle doesn't mean faster plays. Getting to the LoS faster is what's important in my opinion. I'm honestly not too upset about the second half. Of course we need to make adjustments and the defense sucked but as far as coaching goes I think they did well. We controlled the ball for 16 minutes in the 2nd half despite not scoring and only allowed Seattle to have 5 drives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

And what if you don't?  Then what happens to your defense?

Heck, even if you do, your defense doesn't get much rest at a time when it looked like they needed it badly.  On the flipside, a slow sustained drive not only rests your defense, but wears on theirs.

It's basically the Chip Kelly approach, but remember Kelly wore his own defense out as much as he did the other team's.

Again, I understand the idea.  I just can't get behind it.

They couldn't stop it in the first half, when Carolina had a huge advantage in TOP, so why decide to stop yourself in the second? I'm not saying go full Chip Kelly, but there's no reason to go into a shell in the third and completely disregard an offensive plan that already scored 24 points. My issue is that they only generated one 'slow, sustained drive' that ate any significant time, and a faster pace on an earlier drive may have taken MORE time by going farther and even gotten points. 

Like I said before, if they even get 3 points (or ideally 7 -14) in the third then this conversation isn't happening. Either way though, I'm very happy the team won. Don't want to lose sight of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Clark played 2 seasons in college and had a grand total of 1,340 yards with 6 TDs. T-Mac had 1,402 and 10 as a Sophomore and 1,319 and 8 as a Junior in one less game since they didn't make a bowl (not to mention his 702 and 8 as a Freshman). Chark's only 1,000 yard NFL season (which was only 1,008 yards to begin with, and only 3 games over 79 yards that year) came in an offense where the only other non RB's in the offense to have more than 35 targets were Chris Conely (90 targets for 775 yards) and Dede Westbrook (101 targets for 660 yards).  His 2nd best season, his competition for targets was Keelan Cole Sr (88 targets for 642 yards), Laviska (79 targets for 600) and Conley again (63 targets for 471). Beyond his 1k season, he had seasons of 706, 525, 502, 174, 154, and 31 yards, despite being the #1 WR on his team for 3 of his 4 seasons that he had over 174 yards. Any 1st round WR should already be considered a better WR than that, let alone one taken in the Top 10 and has the college statistics that T-Mac had.  Had we traded back and taken Egbuka or Golden, I'd still be saying the same thing about them vs Chark, this has nothing to do with my personal love of T-Mac. 
    • I'm not sure his idea of us being 28th at the start of the season isn't wrong. It's hard to project who we are based off the fact all the rookies we are depending on to contribute but know nothing about. we don't know what derrick brown looks like week 1.. hunter renfrow t-mac,legette, and our tight ends. we are going to have two new starting safeties no matter what. I think it's hard to know just which way the dial can swing on this roster.
    • That's certainly what we hope but c'mon... stating it as fact when he's never played a down of NFL football? 
×
×
  • Create New...