Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Inside the NFL championship preview


CelibatePimp

Recommended Posts

Yeah at least they weren't trashing the panthers .

our defensive backs are probably going to be sick and tired of hearing all about those "great WRs" from the cardinals all week long by the time Sunday rolls around. I hope they practice really well and play lights out at the game to prove they aren't some damn scrubs (dbs besides Norman of course).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arizona away games:

Bears; Lions; Browns; Rams; Eagles (Blow out victories) Not comparable to Panthers.

Seahawks; 49ers; Steelers (Struggled to pull out 2 wins. Lost 1. - Blaine Gabbert and Landry Jones were the QBs) Could not pass on Steelers or 49ers in wet conditions with soft grass turf. Loose/wet grass turf limits a lot of the Cardinals timing patters, sharp cuts in routes, and deep speed. Closer comparison to Panthers.

Tired of all this track meet talk and how explosive they are in games. They are explosive against the bad teams. They are mediocre against the good teams. The Cardinals have done nothing on offense in their last two games. What I have seen watching their games is a team that makes a lot of mistakes on offense and does not tackle well.

34-13 Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The analysis is lacking whenever they have to fit it into a 1 minute sound bite.  These guys don't do their own research. They don't watch every game and they pick games with their johnsons instead of their brains.

It's pretty sad when Chris Collinsworth leaves your show and it gets worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lines are going to determine this game, not the cardinals WRs 

if the Panthers  front four does its job on Palmer the WRs of Arizona won't matter

if the Panthers o line controls line of scrimmage and Jonathan can run and Cam has time, Peterson and the rest won't matter and the clock will be controlled

if the reverse is true, it will be a long day

i will believe in our All Pros...they are all pros for a reason, plus KK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Achilles said:

The analysis is lacking whenever they have to fit it into a 1 minute sound bite.  These guys don't do their own research. They don't watch every game and they pick games with their johnsons instead of their brains.

It's pretty sad when Chris Collinsworth leaves your show and it gets worse.

Agreed.

In fairness. Most people I've seen have picked the Panthers.

But it's clear, these guys just said to themselves, "who's the better team on paper (which still may be debatable)', instead of who's playing the best; home turf; QB's, weather, etc..?

So it was kinda weird seeing none of them pick the Panthers. I guess that's what happens when Irv's not there? LOL

But hey, let's see after Sunday night!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, FootballMaestro said:

Agreed.

In fairness. Most people I've seen have picked the Panthers.

But it's clear, these guys just said to themselves, "who's the better team on paper (which still may be debatable)', instead of who's playing the best; home turf; QB's, weather, etc..?

So it was kinda weird seeing none of them pick the Panthers. I guess that's what happens when Irv's not there? LOL

But hey, let's see after Sunday night!?

We are the better team on paper! We are the best team in the NFL on paper. No other team even comes close to our amount of Pro-bowlers, All-Pros, All-NFLers...we have the Offensive Player of the Year, the NFL MVP, the NFL Coach of the Year, the NFL offensive coordinator of the Year, and possibly the Defensive Player of the Year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the honesty in your posts--I am not sure Canales is rusing(?) because I don't think we are good enough yet to draft players for depth on day 1.  I do think we are in limbo, fwiw.  At 19, I think you are drafting second rounders in the first.
    • We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
×
×
  • Create New...