Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offseason - Offense or Defense for DG


beastson

Recommended Posts

2 out the last 3 years, the number 1 defense has won the SB. Carolina D is good, but not quite that level

or

Offense, getting Kelvin back will help but man Shula and the tackles still is a problem. Game plan was bad and tackles was getting no help and couldnt keep up

I'm interested to see where Gettle put his focus on in the offseason?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We NEED a RT.  Remmers was more responsible than any individual player on our team for this game.  We need a DE, though Ealy showed the f out tonight.  We need a CB and probably a S.  If it were me, the positional priorities would go BPA among DE/RT in the first, the other one in the second, CB, then S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defense - Need a DE to play alongside Kony Ealy, would like to pick up a FA DE and a DE in draft. Say Goodbye to Jared Allen and Charles Johnson. Let Charles Tillman, Cortland Finnegan, and Roman Harper walk. We need youth in the secondary. Offense- Kelvin Benjamin is already a big addition, let Cotchery go and get a young speedy slot WR. Replace Mike Remmers with Daryl Williams. Get a second TE that is a legit threat in the passing game, Dickson does not provide enough week to week. Finally, perhaps get a blocking FB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This game showed us the same weaknesses we've had for like 4 seasons now.

OTs, DBs, WRs

OT isn't really up for debate anymore, Oher hasn't been good in years and Remmers reminded us why he is who he is, an average guy who can be at best an average player.

WR need is pretty dependent on Funchess' development and KB's return to health as they can potentially be our permanent 1/2 on the field.  But Cotch is old, Ginn has bad hands, and Philly shows up occasionally.  So looking into drafting one should be up there as well.

Need some more fresh blood in the secondary, Coleman was a great find, but Harper and Peanut are old, someone solid with Norman/Bene/Coleman/Tre could turn a great defense into an elite one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, beastson said:

2 out the last 3 years, the number 1 defense has won the SB. Carolina D is good, but not quite that level

or

Offense, getting Kelvin back will help but man Shula and the tackles still is a problem. Game plan was bad and tackles was getting no help and couldnt keep up

I'm interested to see where Gettle put his focus on in the offseason?

I'd go defense. CAR doesn't really have pass rushers like that. Ealy was nice and CJ did his thing but he's a shell of himself. Jared is done. Could you imagine a D where you can just send all four lineman and don't have to blitz all the time to have a consistent pass rush?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Umm, remmers cut, probably Norwell too.

Kicker,..cut.

CJ,... Cut

Cotchery, Harper,,....Cut

Go draft CB, OT, DE, another OG.

Benji Funchess Ginn and Brown are our receivers. The rest can go to hell.

Tolbert,... I'm still pissed so I'll wait until I calm down,...

we are in great shape though. If we have another strong draft, I see us fighting for it again and again as long as we keep this corps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...