Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bayless and Stephen A on Mike Shula


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Guys were talking about the offense we saw last night, Bayless said Shula called a terrible game, didn't understand anything he was doing. Stephen A said It wasn't Mike's fault, said no matter what he called the Broncos had an answer for it.

So what is it, did Mike screw the pooch last night or was it just a matter of the Broncos defense being better than our offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mc52beast said:

Guys were talking about the offense we saw last night, Bayless said Shula called a terrible game, didn't understand anything he was doing. Stephen A said It wasn't Mike's fault, said no matter what he called the Broncos had an answer for it.

So what is it, did Mike screw the pooch last night or was it just a matter of the Broncos defense being better than our offense.

We saw nothing of what we had been doing this year last night. We also saw no adjustments after halftime. We got Shula'd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rodeo said:

We wasted every single first down with the same run up the middle. It was one of our most poorly called games of all time.

The offense I saw last night looked exactly like 2014. You can probably tell who decided to take control of the offense yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Guys were talking about the offense we saw last night, Bayless said Shula called a terrible game, didn't understand anything he was doing. Stephen A said It wasn't Mike's fault, said no matter what he called the Broncos had an answer for it.

So what is it, did Mike screw the pooch last night or was it just a matter of the Broncos defense being better than our offense.

Both. Shula called a terrible game. Blown assignments, dropped balls, few bad throws, crucial turnovers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said on another thread, it was almost like we tried to turn Cam into Tom Brady back there and ended up with the same results.  Very little creativity on the calls, very few option plays, no misdirection, no reverses, only that one God awful trick play.  Almost like they left half the playbook in Charlotte.  Nothing appeared to be done with the cadence or snap count to draw them offside or to try to slow down their pass rush.  Just drop Cam back time after time to get killed by the same pass rush that we had no answer for time after time.  We were even back to having the old problem of Cam getting to the line of scrimmage with 5 seconds left on the play clock so he had zero time to look over the defense and do anything other than barely get the snap off.

Having said that, Shula didn't cause the turnovers, penalties, dropped passes, etc. so its unfair to blame everything on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, rodeo said:

We wasted every single first down with the same run up the middle. It was one of our most poorly called games of all time.

In that regard it was one of the most poorly called games I've ever seen. I mean, how scripted can you get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What frustrates me the most about the runs up the middle is that its just not well designed play, majority of the time when Stew gets the ball he runs into the back of Kalil or Turner-Norwell and gets stopped in his tracks by the defender. Just a botched play 80% of the time from the jump

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't like the runs up the middle or the trick play either, but we would have won if we would have executed. The Tolbert fumble and dropped passes were killers.

I am by no means saying the play calling was great though. It certainly didn't look like we made any adjustments in the 2nd Half, but again that is subjective because I have no way of knowing.  

The one thing I am mad at Shula about is that it did seem like time and time again we were getting to the line with under 10 seconds on the play clock.  Hard for Cam to make adjustments in that situation. Seemed like the plays were so coming in and that is on Shula 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...