Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Norman Contract talks have stalled, bruh is getting the franchise tag.


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, thennek said:

I am a Panthers fan over a fan of any one player.  If the Panthers don't want to over-pay for a player, I trust they know what is best for the organization.  I'd rather the Panthers continue to win.....year after year....than sign our favorite players to a contract that hurts the team long-term.

Well said.  That probably describes my attitude too, though a player like Josh with such a megawatt personality and a big playmaker makes watching the Panthers so much more fun & interesting, and it would be hard to see him go.  But, yeah, Gettleman was brought in to create a winning franchise, and given that we've not yet ever had back to back winning seasons, that's a goal we can't afford to forget by throwing money at favorite players.

Josh is great.  Hope Getts can negotiate a deal that doesn't sacrifice the long-term future of the team.  But if he can't I trust him to do what's best for the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Josh bet on himself and hit the jackpot. He played his position very well this year. Have you even looked at the stats vs. him? As for not playing well , I don't know what you're talking about. No one can stop everything.

In regards to the 9 mil, you may think this, but unfortunately the people that know football won't. Even if you believe that Norman is suspect, his play since the second part of '14 says that he should get top five money.

Really, man, comparatively, Josh has been a beast for what he has brought to the table for the last season and a half. I doubt that there is anyone that we can get better.

We don't need anyone better. For the Love of God, we had the #1 offense in the league without KB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TheNewStandard said:

And neither should he. Any player willing to hold-up the progress of this organization is a cancer and we brought Coleman off the couch and he went plum-nuts gonzo while taking the shine off of the year J-No had...seriously, a guy off the couch.

You can't compare a safety to a corner..  Just stop.. 

And Coleman wasn't on the couch..  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheNewStandard said:

And neither should he. Any player willing to hold-up the progress of this organization is a cancer and we brought Coleman off the couch and he went plum-nuts gonzo while taking the shine off of the year J-No had...seriously, a guy off the couch.

Well built, solid teams don't require prima donnas to be competitive.  

In fact, I would submit they are better off without them. 

Norman is an outstanding DB, but much of his success is due to those around him.

I am not convinced he appreciates that as much as he should. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ctrcat said:

I agree but the tag could also be a precursor to a trade as well.  The Raiders ($60+ million) and Jaguars ($70+ million) have an ungodly amount of cap space and corner as their #1 listed need.  JNo was not a GMan pick and imho it's a "fluid" situation where I'm also neutral.  I want JNo back but the only long term guarantees on this team are Cam and Luke.  Getting nothing for him but one year at a high number is starting not to sit well with me either.

It would take at least a 1st to get him in a trade from us and Jags definitely won't give up the 5th pick for him and I'd be very surprised if the Raiders were willing to give up the 14th pick. I suppose they could wait until after the draft and send a 2017 1st but usually teams have their rosters pretty well set by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, TheNewStandard said:

I'll almost guarantee you that he'll hold out. 

Just let his butt go. He's not exactly a saint in the locker-room and he is not worth a tag. 

If anyone should get a tag, it should be Tolbert (if Tolbert is indeed a free-agent and gets the FB designation rather than the RB distinction.) 

Josh isn't worth a penny over 9-million per and I think that's being generous considering how he ended the season compared to how he began.

I have questions about his motor and attitude but I don't blame him for trying to go out and get his...because this is his one shot to get a career deal.

 

image.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seriously hope Standard isn't serious with those posts.  Coleman was a good pickup, and had a lot of ints, but he also was out of position a lot.

I really think people are dismissing a top CB far too quick.   The ability to take a QB's #1 option away most of the time is invaluable.  

I don't blame Josh for wanting all he can get.  He could play the first play of the year and get hurt and never play again.   The Panthers had their chance to sign him before last season and they didn't offer enough.  Norman bet on himself and proved that he is, who he thinks he is.

And seriously questioning this guy in the locker room?  Did you see the videos of Norman being more upset about losing the SB than anyone else?  Just stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Well built, solid teams don't require prima donnas to be competitive.  

In fact, I would submit they are better off without them. 

Norman is an outstanding DB, but much of his success is due to those around him.

I am not convinced he appreciates that as much as he should. 

Much of any player's success is due to those around him. 

 

As for Josh being a cancer, that is poppycock. The business side of football is the business side of football. The future security of your family trumps everything. Owners look out for themselves, and players should look out for themselves. If you don't want holdouts, get rid of the tag altogether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure I have been saying "work out a deal before the tag deadline, or tag him (without him signing the tender) and work on a deal later" for a while now... it isn't rocket surgery here... At this point, a tag is only further proof that we want him here, and it should earn us some time and credibility in any deal that is eventually reached.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bartin said:

It would take at least a 1st to get him in a trade from us and Jags definitely won't give up the 5th pick for him and I'd be very surprised if the Raiders were willing to give up the 14th pick. I suppose they could wait until after the draft and send a 2017 1st but usually teams have their rosters pretty well set by then.

Certainly to get to 5 we'd have to include 30.  I find it unlikely, but not sure how GMan feels about the top of the board or how strongly he feels about wanting the extra cap space.  It takes two to tango, but if the Jags/Raiders truly want a sure thing in JNo and we truly would rather have the cap space, a trade could be massaged with an extra pick or player on either side(s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let me get this straight. Josh Norman should be let go because they have not agreed on a contract? They have been negotiating for about a week now. Norman is one of the best corners in the league. Of course it will take some time to get together on a deal. But to say he is a cancer and a prima donna and the team should just let him go is absolute horse poo. 

first it is that Philly Brown sucks and should be cut, now it is Norma who should be let go. Should we just not sign Star because he didn't get enough sacks this past year. He must suck too. 

You would think that after an overall successful year, minus the one big win, that this type of crap would be less this year. But I guess not. You people amaze me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

If next season Josh has another outstanding performance there is likely some GM out there that will pay him the big money.

Chances are DG isn't going to be that GM.  

Eh, I think DG just tags him again for $16.8M. I mean I'd sign Josh today to a 2 year/$31M deal which is basically what that would be. Of course, at that point you really risk pissing him off and him holding out while occupying that space on the cap so it's not without risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...