Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Money or winning?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

If you were an NFL free agent, would you take significantly less money to play for a Super Bowl contender, or would it be "Hey, it's a short career so I've got to make as much as I can to take care of me and my family (and my five cars)".

If you had to choose one or the other, where would your priorities be?

(as to how much money "significantly less" means, that's up to you to decide)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends where I am in my career...

if I was an old vet? I would consider making a ring a priority.  Take less to increase my odds of a ring 

If I was young? I'm going to largely follow the money. I likely would still have some restrictions on how far I would go chasing dollars but making the most I could make would be a priority. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that injury could cut short your career at any time.  You're not technically guaranteed a "last few years".

Also worth remembering there are things like endorsements and visibility to consider. These things come much easier on a winning team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be something I wouldn't really understand unless I was in that situation.   To me, I would take the money, but if I was someone that has worked hard and trained all those years and had a decent nest egg already, maybe I'd want to win.

The problem with betting on a ring over money is, anything can happen and it's hard to win a ring.  I don't see how it would really matter unless your Hall of Fame chances were hinged on it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Money almost always wins out, especially on that 2nd contract.

for example: Josh has earned $2.3 million in four years with the Panthers. He deserves to get paid. Now if the dollar amount is close, I'm sure he (like everyone) wants that ring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, uncfan888 said:

hopefully they'll start saying the same about us

There is an alternate scenario, and one that I think is more relevant to us in Carolina.

Sometimes young guys sign with a good team to "grow their brand" and get their name out there, figuring they can cash in after that.

It's happened more than once here in the last few years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...