Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Love talks continue


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

given the track records of our beat writers I guess this means Love is going to retire later today

I laughed, but this came from Gettleman himself during his media availability today during league meetings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

That's what I was thinking, but the dumbasses here kept saying we're not signing 2 nose tackles. 

Not everyone that signs makes the team. Should we draft a DT early which seems very possible given the depth at the position then one of Love or Soliai likely wouldn't be on the 53. Only time we've carried 5 DTs on the 53 under Gettleman is when Star was injured at the beginning of last year. Once Star was back and healthy, Colin Cole was cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shadow said:

Star, Love, and Soilai eat up blockers right?  Don't we want another KK type DT?  Do you take all three to camp with the intentions of keeping Star and either Love or Soilai?  I'm asking because I don't know.

It's pretty common for the Panthers to carry nine defensive linemen.

Five tackles and four ends in an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...