Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettlemen offered Norman just above 10 mill per season


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

I'd say that's what he's worth within our system...he's a great corner, among the best in the nfl. But the Panthers rely far more on pressure from the front 7 then elite coverage skills from the back end. If we had broken the bank with Jno we might not have money down the road with kk or star, who are more valuable to our defense then an all pro corner would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Would have only been the 10th highest paid corner in the league. Just a hair above what Jason McCourty is making in Tennessee. But Norman is the greedy one lol.

I get what you are saying, but that isn't the panthers fault Tennessee over paid for their guy, no reason we should for ours. I'm a big fan of Josh too, no hate towards him whatsoever, glad he got paid...just not that much by this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what he's worth in our system.  There's no way we could've or should've given him the deal the Skins did.  Not with having Short and/or Star and Turner and/or Norwell to lock up.  Dave is always gonna prioritize the trenches.

Let's see what Norman does in DC.  Maybe he was a product of our system/coaches?  Maybe his brashness goes completely over the top now that he's the highest paid CB in the league and TD isn't around to reel him back in?  We shall see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, usmcpanthers said:

1 year of elite play, Josh getting up in age. Now if Josh played at the same level on the franchise tag, then he would have 2 years elite play. Im sure Gman wouldnt of lowballed him then, Josh was just greedy and punched his ticket out of town.

I'm not sure you understand how the FA market works.  Janoris Jenkins had about the same trajectory but didn't even play close to as well as Josh, and got paid a significant amount more than this lowball offer.    When you have a choice between a one year deal at 13/11 mill a year or a 5 year, 75$ million 50 guaranteed deal in your life, come back and tell us you took the cheap route because you're "not greedy".    You aren't an athlete and you aren't making that money.  Also, cut about 50% off the top from taxes and agent fees.  Athletes don't get to hide their earnings in offshore accounts or capital gains, they get hit hard on taxes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...