Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettleman: we only had one guy rated higher when we picked Bradberry, a defensive tackle

CatMan72

By CatMan72,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
Posted

On WFNZ this morning Gettleman said we only had one guy rated marginally higher we we picked Bradberry and this higher rated player was at a stacked position.

 

IGO Edit: Huddle confirms the player was indeed a DT per NFL Source. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jeremy Igo Newbie

Jeremy Igo

Posted
Posted

They likely had a DT ranked higher (two DTs taken just after Panthers picked) but since they just drafted one in round 1 they passed. 

 

Imagine the Huddle if they drafted DTs in round 1 and 2. lol

 

 

EDIT: My sources now confirm this. It was a DT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AppHeel Apprentice

AppHeel

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

They likely had a DT ranked higher (two DTs taken just after Panthers picked) but since they just drafted one in round 1 they passed. 

 

Imagine the Huddle if they drafted DTs in round 1 and 2. lol

 

 

EDIT: My sources now confirm this. It was a DT. 

Jonathon Bullard is a smart guess here imo. I'm good with Bradberry though

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdpanther5 Newbie

jdpanther5

Posted
Posted

Yeah it's pretty clearly a DT if you look at the guys between our picks. Nowhere else we'd be considered "stacked."

31 (62)PanthersSamfordBradberry, James (CB)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By frankw · Posted

      I think the Bevell hire has more to do with adding actual veteran head coaching experience to the staff than anything else. But I do wholeheartedly agree that the obsession in general with Seattle needs to come to an end. I mean we plucked the one guy there to be our GM who turned out to be our worst GM in franchise history in just a few short years and that's really saying something given our history there. Clearly trying to mimick Seattle in any way has not been productive. As far as Idzik many of us have asked the same question but at this point in time it doesn't really matter anymore because Canales is either going to lead this franchise to a winning record or he will be shown the door.
    • Anybodyhome
      NHL Olympics Thread (Or just Olympics in general)

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      Why wasn't here even considered? Better record and save % than any of t he 3 goalies on the US squad.
    • strato
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By strato · Posted

      That’s why Bevell is a good move. Idzik might not be chopped liver, he is just inexperienced and even less ready to be the play caller than Canales. I still say the playbook is limited which is a hinderance to calling plays, I would imagine.    Anyway Beavis lol… no Bevell, got to consecutive SBs as an OC and won one with 48 points or something. Should have won the second one. And had several more good years there.    They were the team we had to learn how to beat it took us til the third year I think before we could go into Seattle and successfully compete.   That is glass half full thinking, yep, but that is head and shoulders over what we have had here for a while. Certainly now.     In addition.. It was Canales’ boss. He knew more then , I would bet he knows more now. I can’t look at this as anything but a potential positive thing.  Hell he might be the guy that can look at Dave and say what the fug are you doing? And Dave will listen. I think I can hope for that.  Maybe not.      
×
×
  • Create New...